[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9776 for your review

2025-03-19 Thread Brian Haberman via auth48archive
Hi Karen, Approved! Thank you for all your efforts!! Regards, Brian > On Mar 18, 2025, at 8:40 PM, Karen Moore wrote: > > Hello Brian, > > We have updated our files to reflect “source-list”. Please review and let us > know if any further changes are needed or if you approve the document

[auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9777 for your review

2025-03-19 Thread Brian Haberman via auth48archive
Approved! > On Mar 18, 2025, at 8:40 PM, Karen Moore wrote: > > Hi Brian and *Gunter (AD), > > Our files have been updated to reflect “source-list” and “filter-mode”. > Please review and let us know if any further changes are needed or if you > approve the document in its current form. > >

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9778 for your review

2025-03-17 Thread Brian Haberman via auth48archive
publication process. > > For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9778 > > Thank you, > RFC Editor/kc > > >> On Mar 11, 2025, at 1:04 PM, Brian Haberman via auth48archive >> wrote: >> >> Response

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9776 for your review

2025-03-17 Thread Brian Haberman via auth48archive
Hi Karen, Responses in-line... > On Mar 14, 2025, at 6:34 PM, Karen Moore wrote: > > Hi Brian, > > Thank you for your reply. We have updated our files based on your responses, > and we have included the terminology updates you made per the cluster-wide > questions. We have some addition

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9776 for your review

2025-03-18 Thread Brian Haberman via auth48archive
Hi Karen, > On Mar 17, 2025, at 5:53 PM, Karen Moore wrote: > > Hi Brian, > > Thank you for your review and reply. We have made the following changes: > > - updated 2 instances of “1 query retransmissions” to “1 query > retransmission(s)” Looks good. > > - updated the text to reflect “Que

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9777 for your review

2025-03-19 Thread Brian Haberman via auth48archive
Hi Karen, > On Mar 14, 2025, at 6:34 PM, Karen Moore wrote: > > Hi Brian, > > Thank you for providing the XML files with updates to the terminology (per > the cluster-wide questions) and answers to our questions. We have added > further updates based on your replies; the updated files are bel

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9777 for your review

2025-04-05 Thread Brian Haberman via auth48archive
Hi Karen, All these changes look good. Please make the “source list” —> “source-list” and “filter mode” —> “filter-mode” changes per my response on 9776. Thanks! Brian > On Mar 17, 2025, at 5:53 PM, Karen Moore wrote: > > Hi Brian, > > Thank you for your reply and clarifications. Our fi

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9778 for your review

2025-03-11 Thread Brian Haberman via auth48archive
Responses to the RFC Editor questions are inline... > On Mar 11, 2025, at 2:24 AM, rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org wrote: > > Brian, > > Authors, > > While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve (as necessary) > the following questions, which are also in the XML file. > > 1) No obj