[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9797 for your review

Hi Jerome and Yiu, Jerome - apologies for the belated response! Thank you for your approval. We have now received all necessary approvals and consider AUTH48 complete: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9797 Thank you for your attention and guidance during the AUTH48 process. We will move thi

[auth48] Re: [mpls] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9790

All, I don’t think we want to go to PSFN, we should stay with PFN and expand it as we do now. /Loa On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 at 23:19, Rebecca VanRheenen < rvanrhee...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: > Hi Kireeti and Loa, > > Kireeti, thank you for your review and suggestions! We have updated the > docu

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9800 for your review

Authors, Thank you for your replies and guidance. We have updated accordingly and added the keywords suggested to our database. We have also recorded the approvals we have received thus far at the AUTH48 status page for this document (see below). We had the following questions/comments relate

[auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9790

Hi Kireeti and Loa, Kireeti, thank you for your review and suggestions! We have updated the document accordingly, except for the following: Current: Post-stack First Nibble (PFN) Suggested: Post-Stack First Nibble (PFN) As Loa notes, the use of lowercase aligns the expansion with the chose

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9796 for your review

I approve this RFC for publication -Chris > On May 23, 2025, at 2:50 PM, rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org wrote: > > approve your RFC for publication -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9806 for your review

Hi Dan, IANA has updated the media type template as requested. We now consider AUTH48 complete; see https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9806. We will begin to prepare this document for publication at this time. Sincerely, RFC Editor/rv > On Jun 23, 2025, at 9:08 AM, Rebecca VanRheenen > w

[auth48] Re: [IANA #1421755] [IANA] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9806 for your review

Hi David, Thank you for making these changes! Sincerely, RFC Editor/rv > On Jun 20, 2025, at 7:07 PM, David Dong via RT wrote: > > Hi Rebecca, > > This is complete; thank you: > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/rs-metadata+xml > > Best regards, > > David Dong > I

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9800 for your review

Hi RFC Editor/mf, François, Please find below a possible proposed change. Please check it as I'm not a native speaker. §3 OLD: Building upon, and fully compatible with, the mechanisms specified in [RFC8754] and [RFC8986

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9800 for your review

I approve this document for publication. Cheers, Weiqiang Cheng From: Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil) Date: 2025-06-23 20:02 To: rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org; chengweiqi...@chinamobile.com; cf(mailer list); lizhen...@huawei.com; bruno.decra...@orange.com; fclad.i...@gmail.com CC: spring-...@ietf.org

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9800 for your review

Hello, I approve this document for publication. Cheers, Clarence > -Original Message- > From: rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2025 3:47 AM > To: chengweiqi...@chinamobile.com; cf(mailer list) ; > lizhen...@huawei.com; bruno.decra...@orange.com; fclad.i...@gmail.com

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9798 for your review

Hello Sandy, I have gone through this, the changes look good. Kindly proceed with the publication Thanks Prasad From: Sandy Ginoza Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 3:45 AM To: Stig Venaas (svenaas) Cc: Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi) ; RFC Editor ; pim-...@ietf.o