[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9786 for your review

2025-05-21 Thread Karen Moore via auth48archive
Hi Luc, Thank you for your reply and for the updated XML file. We have updated our files accordingly. Note that we updated one instance of "ESI label extended community" to "ESI Label Extended Community" (which will be consistent with "ESI Label" (0x01) per RFC 7432 as well as "DF Election Ex

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9722 for your review

2025-05-21 Thread Patrice Brissette (pbrisset) via auth48archive
Hi Alice, It looks good to me. Regards, Patrice Brissette Distinguished Engineer Cisco Systems From: Alice Russo Date: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 at 12:54 To: Patrice Brissette (pbrisset) , Ali Sajassi (sajassi) , Luc Andre Burdet (lburdet) , je_dr...@yahoo.com , Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) Cc: Gun

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9787 for your review

2025-05-21 Thread Alexey Melnikov via auth48archive
Dear RFC Editor, Replying to some of your questions/comments, where I have an opinion: On 21/05/2025 02:07, rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org wrote: Authors, While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve (as necessary) the following questions, which are also in the XML file.  [...] 14

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9723 for your review

2025-05-21 Thread Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
Hi Dongjie, Thank you for your reply. We have updated the document as described below and posted the files here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9723.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9723.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9723.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/au

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9788 for your review

2025-05-21 Thread Alexey Melnikov via auth48archive
Dear RFC Editor, Thank you for your work! I am replying to some of your questions/suggestions, mostly where I disagree with your suggestions: On 21/05/2025 02:19, rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org wrote: 4) Good idea. 7) Slight change in meaning. We are not typically talking about legacy recipi

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9790 for your review

2025-05-21 Thread Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
Hi Greg, Thank you for your approval. It has been noted on the AUTH48 status page: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9790 We will await approvals from Kireeti, Stewart, Matthew, Loa, and Jie prior to moving this document forward in the publication process. Best regards, RFC Editor/ap > On

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9789 for your review

2025-05-21 Thread Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
Hi Tony, Thank you for your approval. It has been noted on the AUTH48 status page: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9789 We will await approvals from Loa, Stewart, and Matthew proper to moving this document forward in the publication process. Best regards, RFC Editor/ap > On May 20, 2025,

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9676 for your review

2025-05-21 Thread Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) via auth48archive
Go for it! Eliot On 21.05.2025 10:05, ENRICO FRANCESCONI wrote: Dear All,    thank you very much for all your efforts and collaboration! It was a long but fruitful process. If you don’t have additional remarks, we would like to announce the RFC in our channels too. Best regards    Enrico