Re: [aur-general] I want to take over go-openoffice-el

2010-09-28 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2010/9/29 Χρήστος Κώτσαρης : > This package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27124 > has been out of date for quite some time, and his maintener hasn't yet > answered my email. I believe he is no longer interested in maintaining > it. I have attached my updated PKGBUILD, i have tested on bo

[aur-general] I want to take over go-openoffice-el

2010-09-28 Thread Χρήστος Κώτσαρης
This package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27124 has been out of date for quite some time, and his maintener hasn't yet answered my email. I believe he is no longer interested in maintaining it. I have attached my updated PKGBUILD, i have tested on both my machines (i686&x64) and it work

Re: [aur-general] perl CPAN modules

2010-09-28 Thread Justin Davis
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Nathan O wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:12 PM, J. W. Birdsong < > jwbirds...@jwbirdsong.homelinux.com> wrote: > >> On 09/29/10 at 12:16am, Philipp Überbacher wrote: >> > Excerpts from Nathan O's message of 2010-09-28 22:53:45 +0200: >> > > Not sure, didn't know

Re: [aur-general] perl CPAN modules

2010-09-28 Thread Nathan O
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:12 PM, J. W. Birdsong < jwbirds...@jwbirdsong.homelinux.com> wrote: > On 09/29/10 at 12:16am, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > > Excerpts from Nathan O's message of 2010-09-28 22:53:45 +0200: > > > Not sure, didn't know if we had a way to do this, so I thought I would > bring

Re: [aur-general] perl CPAN modules

2010-09-28 Thread J. W. Birdsong
On 09/29/10 at 12:16am, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > Excerpts from Nathan O's message of 2010-09-28 22:53:45 +0200: > > Not sure, didn't know if we had a way to do this, so I thought I would bring > > it up, kinda thought that it would be interesting to add to AUR if we didn't > > have something sim

Re: [aur-general] perl CPAN modules

2010-09-28 Thread Philipp Überbacher
Excerpts from Nathan O's message of 2010-09-28 22:53:45 +0200: > Not sure, didn't know if we had a way to do this, so I thought I would bring > it up, kinda thought that it would be interesting to add to AUR if we didn't > have something similar. > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Philipp Überba

Re: [aur-general] perl CPAN modules

2010-09-28 Thread Nathan O
Not sure, didn't know if we had a way to do this, so I thought I would bring it up, kinda thought that it would be interesting to add to AUR if we didn't have something similar. On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > Excerpts from Nathan O's message of 2010-09-28 22:40:10 +0

Re: [aur-general] perl CPAN modules

2010-09-28 Thread Philipp Überbacher
Excerpts from Nathan O's message of 2010-09-28 22:40:10 +0200: > I was looking at how Gentoo creates packages and I noticed one thing, is > that Gentoo, during build, will use CPAN to get the required modules for the > package that is being built. I was thinking, I wonder if this could be > impleme

[aur-general] perl CPAN modules

2010-09-28 Thread Nathan O
I was looking at how Gentoo creates packages and I noticed one thing, is that Gentoo, during build, will use CPAN to get the required modules for the package that is being built. I was thinking, I wonder if this could be implemented into AUR?

Re: [aur-general] package 'php-imagick' has been marked out-of-date for a long time

2010-09-28 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 28.09.2010 15:59, Upsuper wrote: > I found that the package has been orphaned just now, and I adopt it without > contacting with the original maintainer... > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > >> On 28.09.2010 15:35, Upsuper wrote: >>> The package 'php-imagick' in a

Re: [aur-general] package 'php-imagick' has been marked out-of-date for a long time

2010-09-28 Thread Upsuper
I found that the package has been orphaned just now, and I adopt it without contacting with the original maintainer... On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > On 28.09.2010 15:35, Upsuper wrote: > > The package 'php-imagick' in aur has been marked out-of-date for a long > >

Re: [aur-general] package 'php-imagick' has been marked out-of-date for a long time

2010-09-28 Thread Upsuper
OK, I'll try. On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > On 28.09.2010 15:35, Upsuper wrote: > > The package 'php-imagick' in aur has been marked out-of-date for a long > > time, it seems that the original maintainer is not interested in continue > > maintaining it. And the ver

Re: [aur-general] package 'php-imagick' has been marked out-of-date for a long time

2010-09-28 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 28.09.2010 15:35, Upsuper wrote: > The package 'php-imagick' in aur has been marked out-of-date for a long > time, it seems that the original maintainer is not interested in continue > maintaining it. And the version now in the aur may cause some error as the > imagemagick has been updated for

[aur-general] package 'php-imagick' has been marked out-of-date for a long time

2010-09-28 Thread Upsuper
The package 'php-imagick' in aur has been marked out-of-date for a long time, it seems that the original maintainer is not interested in continue maintaining it. And the version now in the aur may cause some error as the imagemagick has been updated for several times. I'd like to take the original

Re: [aur-general] move openlh-{client,core,server} to AUR

2010-09-28 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 28 September 2010 11:11, Laurent Carlier wrote: > Le mardi 28 septembre 2010 08:54:36, Andrea Scarpino a écrit : > +1, move them. Done! -- andreascarpino.it Arch Linux Developer

Re: [aur-general] move openlh-{client,core,server} to AUR

2010-09-28 Thread Laurent Carlier
Le mardi 28 septembre 2010 08:54:36, Andrea Scarpino a écrit : > Can I move these orphans packages with less then 1% of votes > (pkgstats) from [community] to AUR? > openlh-client > openlh-core > openlh-server +1, move them.

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Orphans && Out-Of-Date packages in [extra]

2010-09-28 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 10 September 2010 15:51, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > smc requires cegui 0.62b and cannot use the newer one. I suggest > creating a cegui-0.62 package and dropping cegui as well as smc to > community. I'd take them there. cegui and smc moved to [community]. Thanks! -- andreascarpino.it Arch Li

Re: [aur-general] move openlh-{client,core,server} to AUR

2010-09-28 Thread Jakob Gruber
On 09/28/2010 08:54 AM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: Can I move these orphans packages with less then 1% of votes (pkgstats) from [community] to AUR? openlh-client openlh-core openlh-server Dead sources, +1