On 2025-05-29 20:01, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 9:10 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On 2025-04-11 14:14, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Mar 5, 2025 Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > >
> > > > When no audit rules are in place, fanotify event results are
> > > > unconditionally droppe
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 9:10 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 2025-04-11 14:14, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Mar 5, 2025 Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > >
> > > When no audit rules are in place, fanotify event results are
> > > unconditionally dropped due to an explicit check for the existence of
> >
On 2025-04-11 14:14, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mar 5, 2025 Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> >
> > When no audit rules are in place, fanotify event results are
> > unconditionally dropped due to an explicit check for the existence of
> > any audit rules. Given this is a report from another security
> >
On Mar 5, 2025 Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>
> When no audit rules are in place, fanotify event results are
> unconditionally dropped due to an explicit check for the existence of
> any audit rules. Given this is a report from another security
> sub-system, allow it to be recorded regardless of t
On Fri 07-03-25 14:19:38, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 2025-03-07 15:52, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Thu 06-03-25 20:12:23, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > On 2025-03-06 16:06, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > On Wed 05-03-25 16:33:19, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > > > When no audit rules are in place, fanot
On 2025-03-07 15:52, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 06-03-25 20:12:23, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On 2025-03-06 16:06, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Wed 05-03-25 16:33:19, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > > When no audit rules are in place, fanotify event results are
> > > > unconditionally dropped due to a
On Thu 06-03-25 20:12:23, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 2025-03-06 16:06, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 05-03-25 16:33:19, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > When no audit rules are in place, fanotify event results are
> > > unconditionally dropped due to an explicit check for the existence of
> > > any
On 2025-03-06 16:06, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 05-03-25 16:33:19, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > When no audit rules are in place, fanotify event results are
> > unconditionally dropped due to an explicit check for the existence of
> > any audit rules. Given this is a report from another security
>
On Wed 05-03-25 16:33:19, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> When no audit rules are in place, fanotify event results are
> unconditionally dropped due to an explicit check for the existence of
> any audit rules. Given this is a report from another security
> sub-system, allow it to be recorded regardles
When no audit rules are in place, fanotify event results are
unconditionally dropped due to an explicit check for the existence of
any audit rules. Given this is a report from another security
sub-system, allow it to be recorded regardless of the existence of any
audit rules.
To test, install and
10 matches
Mail list logo
