This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via 5d73084fbae0b96a17bd3be4500163e10b7f75f8 (commit)
from 404aea2c15cc85702
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via 5d73084fbae0b96a17bd3be4500163e10b7f75f8 (commit)
from 404aea2c15cc85702
Hi all,
The two functions `TeX-slipt-string' and `TeX-assoc' have similar
built-in functions `split-string' and `assoc-string', and are easy to be
replaced by them as done in the attached patches. I'd like to apply
them.
What I ponder now is whether we should leave compatibility alias like
(defal
Stefan Monnier writes:
>> I suggest to apply the following change to reftex-auc.el. The declared
>> functions are defined in ext:latex and not ext:tex; and the name of
>> arguments are also corrected. I don't have access to emacs repo, do you
>> mind install the change?
>
> Pushed, thanks,
Tha
Ikumi Keita writes:
> The two functions `TeX-slipt-string' and `TeX-assoc' have similar
> built-in functions `split-string' and `assoc-string', and are easy to
> be replaced by them as done in the attached patches. I'd like to apply
> them.
LGTM.
> What I ponder now is whether we should leave c
Hi all,
I think we should have a test suite for general fontification of latex
file. Adding such a test isn't complicated:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
diff --git a/tests/latex/font-latex-test.el b/tests/latex/font-latex-test.el
index 5e5fccf0..4482a9bc 10064
