> Thanks. I've found one more occurrence of XEmacs compat code in
> reftex-vars.el. Can you please install the attached patch as well?
> TIA.
Thanks, pushed.
> Note to myself: We have to adjust RefTeX manual as well and mention the
> removal of XEmacs support.
I believe I just took care of tha
Stefan Monnier writes:
>> I suggest to apply the following change to reftex-auc.el. The declared
>> functions are defined in ext:latex and not ext:tex; and the name of
>> arguments are also corrected. I don't have access to emacs repo, do you
>> mind install the change?
>
> Pushed, thanks,
Tha
> I suggest to apply the following change to reftex-auc.el. The declared
> functions are defined in ext:latex and not ext:tex; and the name of
> arguments are also corrected. I don't have access to emacs repo, do you
> mind install the change?
Pushed, thanks,
Stefan
Stefan Monnier writes:
>>> Many thanks for this. I ran `make' in tests directory and get the
>>> following error (re-arranged for legibility):
>> Thanks for the report. I don't experience such error, so I suppose that
>> emacs 28 enhanced check for scope discrepancy between lexical and
>> dynami
>> Many thanks for this. I ran `make' in tests directory and get the
>> following error (re-arranged for legibility):
> Thanks for the report. I don't experience such error, so I suppose that
> emacs 28 enhanced check for scope discrepancy between lexical and
> dynamic variables. (I'm using emacs
Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
> Many thanks for this. I ran `make' in tests directory and get the
> following error (re-arranged for legibility):
Thanks for the report. I don't experience such error, so I suppose that
emacs 28 enhanced check for scope discrepancy between lexical and
dyna
Ikumi Keita writes:
>> Ikumi Keita writes:
>> Stefan Monnier writes:
>>> BTW, I rebased my branch on top of your patch, and hence on top of
>>> auctex.git's `master`.
>
>> Thanks, I'd like to merge them into AUCTeX repository. If nobody
>> objects, I'll do it soon.
>
> Merged.
Many tha
>> Thanks, I'd like to merge them into AUCTeX repository. If nobody
>> objects, I'll do it soon.
> Merged.
Great, thanks!
Stefan
> Ikumi Keita writes:
> Stefan Monnier writes:
>> BTW, I rebased my branch on top of your patch, and hence on top of
>> auctex.git's `master`.
> Thanks, I'd like to merge them into AUCTeX repository. If nobody
> objects, I'll do it soon.
Merged.
Bye,
Ikumi Keita
> Stefan Monnier writes:
> BTW, I rebased my branch on top of your patch, and hence on top of
> auctex.git's `master`.
Thanks, I'd like to merge them into AUCTeX repository. If nobody
objects, I'll do it soon.
Regards,
Ikumi Keita
> Oh, I wasn't aware of that! Thank you.
>
> By the way again, here are two very minor issues about your update to
> font-latex.el:
> 1. The doc string of `font-latex-keywords-1' was formerly
> "Subdued level highlighting for LaTeX modes."
> , but is now
> "High level highlighting for LaTeX modes."
> Stefan Monnier writes:
> I think your patch is much better/cleaner than what I put in my branch
> (since it removes those hideous advice), so if you push your patch to
> AUCTeX's branch, I'll be happy to rebase my code on top if it.
Thanks, I just pushed it.
>> By the way, may I ask why ma
BTW, I rebased my branch on top of your patch, and hence on top of
auctex.git's `master`.
Stefan
>> Duh! Thanks for the heads up!
>> Indeed, `defadvice` hides the code from the byte-compiler which is why
>> I didn't get a warning for the (boundp 'begin).
>
> I expect that the attached patch makes preview.el.in ready for lexical
> binding...oops, I just noticed that revised commit has been put
Hi Stefan,
> Stefan Monnier writes:
> Duh! Thanks for the heads up!
> Indeed, `defadvice` hides the code from the byte-compiler which is why
> I didn't get a warning for the (boundp 'begin).
I expect that the attached patch makes preview.el.in ready for lexical
binding...oops, I just notice
> Duh! Thanks for the heads up!
> Indeed, `defadvice` hides the code from the byte-compiler which is why
> I didn't get a warning for the (boundp 'begin).
> And I clearly forgot my usual scan of `(set `.
I (force) pushed an updated set of patches which should fix
those problems.
Stefan
> (defadvice TeX-region-create (around preview-counters)
> "Write out counter information to region."
> (let ((TeX-region-extra
> (concat
> (and (boundp 'begin)
> ^
>preview-buffer-has-counters
>(mapconcat
>
Hi Stefan,
> Stefan Monnier writes:
> I pushed to the branch `scratch/auctex-lexbind` of the `elpa.git`
> repository a series of 10 patches which convert all of AUCTeX to use
> lexical binding, and includes various other more or less
> cosmetic changes.
> The commit log is below, the overall
18 matches
Mail list logo
