Jeremy Bryant writes:
> I find this summary useful, how about adding it to the manual?
Thanks, but I don't think it is useful for the manual. If at all, I
think a more profound comparison is needed, but AUCTeX manual is not the
right place for it. Maybe EmacsWiki or emacs.stackexchange.com or
Arash Esbati writes:
> Paul Nelson writes:
>
>> There is some relevant discussion at
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/8wpatw/auctex_vs_texmode_or_giving_a_texmode_another/,
>> which notes the slower load time of AUCTeX (once per session), some
>> difference in the behavior of imenu (no
Paul Nelson writes:
> There is some relevant discussion at
> https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/8wpatw/auctex_vs_texmode_or_giving_a_texmode_another/,
> which notes the slower load time of AUCTeX (once per session), some
> difference in the behavior of imenu (not an issue if you use
> consul
>
>
>
> Tassilo, do you know what is the reason given by users to like the less
> powerful built-in modes? Presumably they don't need preview-LaTeX, but
> what else?
>
There is some relevant discussion at
https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/8wpatw/auctex_vs_texmode_or_giving_a_texmode_another
Arash Esbati writes:
> Tassilo Horn writes:
>
>> I guess when you only write short documents like letters, there's
>> probably no need for all those features that come with AUCTeX. But
>> that's just a guess. No actual user told me their reasons.
>
> This is also what I've read over the time:
Tassilo Horn writes:
> I guess when you only write short documents like letters, there's
> probably no need for all those features that come with AUCTeX. But
> that's just a guess. No actual user told me their reasons.
This is also what I've read over the time: Some people don't like
AUCTeX's
Jeremy Bryant writes:
Hi Jeremy,
> Tassilo, do you know what is the reason given by users to like the
> less powerful built-in modes? Presumably they don't need
> preview-LaTeX, but what else?
I guess when you only write short documents like letters, there's
probably no need for all those feat
