Re: bug#7053: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: bug#7053: Reftex is fully broken

2010-09-25 Thread Stefan Monnier
> So I contemplate giving up on the separate repository and maintaining > it in the Emacs repository. But this should likely be discussed in > another thread. You have my vote, Stefan ___ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org http://

Re: bug#7053: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: bug#7053: Reftex is fully broken

2010-09-25 Thread Ralf Angeli
* Stefan Monnier (2010-09-21) writes: > I think in the end, the core reason for the problem was a bug in the new > up-list code (it just silently did nothing when reaching BOB), which > I've just fixed. I also additionally installed the patch below which > circumvents the bug and also avoids slow

Re: bug#7053: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: bug#7053: Reftex is fully broken

2010-09-20 Thread Stefan Monnier
>> bothered to follow the switch to Bazaar. It might take a while to make >> myself acquainted with it. And unfortunately I failed to find a web >> interface to the current Emacs sources in order to find out if somebody >> has changed the RefTeX files, or in which way. > I suspect the change is

[AUCTeX-devel] Re: bug#7053: Reftex is fully broken

2010-09-19 Thread Alpár Jüttner
> Thanks. It sounds like the problem is in reftex-what-macro. I'm > CC'ing the reftex author and maintainers in the hope that they can > find the culprit. > > Failing that, perhaps you could do a "bzr bisect" to find the revision > which broke reftex. I try to avoid to do it as far as I can. I

[AUCTeX-devel] Re: bug#7053: Reftex is fully broken

2010-09-19 Thread Alpár Jüttner
> > I try to avoid to do it as far as I can. I'm a big fan of distributed > > version control systems. I use hg in several project with grate success > > and satisfaction. I people have also very good experience with git. > > > > But bzr is so much pain to use. A 'bzr pull' triggers tens of MB ne

[AUCTeX-devel] Re: bug#7053: Reftex is fully broken

2010-09-18 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Alpár Jüttner > Cc: 7...@debbugs.gnu.org, Carsten Dominik , > auctex-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 07:24:13 +0200 > > > Failing that, perhaps you could do a "bzr bisect" to find the revision > > which broke reftex. > > I try to avoid to do it as far as I can. I'm a big fan of

Re: bug#7053: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: bug#7053: Reftex is fully broken

2010-09-18 Thread Ralf Angeli
* Stefan Monnier (2010-09-18) writes: >> Since I've never gotten commit access to the Emacs repository I haven't > > That should be easy to fix. Get a Savannah account, and from there, ask > for membership to the Emacs group. Um, I've been having a Savannah account since 2003 because AUCTeX is a

Re: bug#7053: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: bug#7053: Reftex is fully broken

2010-09-18 Thread Stefan Monnier
> Since I've never gotten commit access to the Emacs repository I haven't That should be easy to fix. Get a Savannah account, and from there, ask for membership to the Emacs group. > bothered to follow the switch to Bazaar. It might take a while to make > myself acquainted with it. And unfortu

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: bug#7053: Reftex is fully broken

2010-09-18 Thread Ralf Angeli
* Eli Zaretskii (2010-09-18) writes: > Thanks. It sounds like the problem is in reftex-what-macro. I'm > CC'ing the reftex author and maintainers in the hope that they can > find the culprit. Since I've never gotten commit access to the Emacs repository I haven't bothered to follow the switch t

[AUCTeX-devel] Re: bug#7053: Reftex is fully broken

2010-09-18 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Alpár Jüttner > Cc: 7...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 06:19:31 +0200 > > On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 18:20 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Alpár Jüttner > > > Cc: 7...@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:49:48 +0200 > > > > > > Here is the GBD trace: > > > > T