main 6c0fb558: * GNUmakefile (clean): Clean up more auxiliary files.

branch: main commit 6c0fb5586998c8e1dce170c680a9881558fe5f14 Author: Arash Esbati Commit: Arash Esbati * GNUmakefile (clean): Clean up more auxiliary files. --- GNUmakefile | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/GNUmakefile b/GNUmakefile index 01608188..776e0cee 100644 --- a

Re: a rather larger inconvience

Uwe Brauer writes: > I have plain confidence in your coding and rightly so 😉. Thanks, just don't expect too much :-) > I applied the patch, recompiled, tested and voila it works as expected Great. For the sake of completeness: C-c C-v for viewing the final product works as well in this setup

Re: a rather larger inconvience

> Uwe Brauer writes: > I'm not sure if it's best to leave it to me, but can you please apply > this small change to `TeX-command-list' and try it again? I have plain confidence in your coding and rightly so 😉. I applied the patch, recompiled, tested and voila it works as expected > diff --git

Re: Drop tarball releases and go ELPA only

Hi Arash, > Arash Esbati writes: > So the conclusion is apply the patch with the comment adjusted and if > someone wants to unload tex-site, s?he has to use the FORCE arg? I think AUCTeX should rather delcare that unload tex-site isn't supported anymore. After all, that has always been the s

Re: Drop tarball releases and go ELPA only

Ikumi Keita writes: >> Arash Esbati writes: >> Thanks for confirming. So the whole change looks like this, or am I >> missing something? > > [...] > >> +;; This can be used for starting up AUCTeX, e.g., when not installed >> +;; ELPA. The following form should safely be undone using >> +;;

Re: Drop tarball releases and go ELPA only

Hi Arash, > Arash Esbati writes: > Thanks for confirming. So the whole change looks like this, or am I > missing something? [...] > +;; This can be used for starting up AUCTeX, e.g., when not installed > +;; ELPA. The following form should safely be undone using > +;; (unload-feature 'tex

main 89c3fb45: ; Fix typo.

branch: main commit 89c3fb45604139cbfc3f20534445b4d401999e24 Author: Arash Esbati Commit: Arash Esbati ; Fix typo. --- style/amsrefs.el | 2 +- style/backref.el | 4 ++-- style/cancel.el| 2 +- style/microtype.el | 4 ++-- style/multibib.el | 4 ++-- style/proc.el | 4 ++-- st

main fde247e4: Add new style files

branch: main commit fde247e4ed7be698b975fae31f09228fb0003add Author: Arash Esbati Commit: Arash Esbati Add new style files * NEWS.org (Added): Announce new files. * style/listings.el (LaTeX-listings-key-val-options): Take keys provided by the new style files into accoun

Re: Drop tarball releases and go ELPA only

Hi Keita, Ikumi Keita writes: > Yes, lisp version is mandatory. Thanks for confirming. So the whole change looks like this, or am I missing something? --8<---cut here---start->8--- diff --git a/auctex.el b/auctex.el index 2f7af507..33240245 100644 --- a/auc

Re: Drop tarball releases and go ELPA only

Hi Arash, > Arash Esbati writes: > What happens then to the users who install AUCTeX from ELPA as a > package? IIUC, Emacs will then rifle through the installation directory > and byte-compile all files without any makefiles etc. That compilation > will again choke on the change above, righ

Re: a rather larger inconvience

Uwe Brauer writes: >> This can be fixed by adding the following to the latexmk command >> (compare with >> https://github.com/ultronozm/auctex-cont-latexmk.el/blob/86eba36913a2980ce64bf116ff54587aa554a66c/auctex-cont-latexmk.el#L230): > >> (concat " -outdir=" (shell-quote-argument TeX-output-dir)