> Stefan Monnier writes:
>> Oh, I see where that happens (and why it doesn't happen if we redirect
>> with `defalias`).
Sorry, I was talking based on my memory when I hacked
`japanese-latex-mode' in tex-jp.el to deal with double loading issue. I
forgot that `hack-one-local-variable' uses `ind
> Oh, I see where that happens (and why it doesn't happen if we redirect
> with `defalias`).
Hmm... no I still can't reproduce it, even with something else than
a defalias.
Stefan
Stefan Monnier [2022-09-25 10:01:40] wrote:
>> 1. Suppose that the file has %%% mode:latex as file variable. When emacs
>> opens this file, it runs `latex-mode' accordingly, which in turn runs
>> AUCTeX `LaTeX-mode' by redirectiton. Then it sets `major-mode' to
>> `LaTeX-mode'. After that, `hack-l
> be a derived mode of `latex-mode'. However, defining `LaTeX-mode' by
> (define-derived-mode LaTeX-mode latex-mode ...) would cause infinite
> loop when redirection is enabled.
Yes, it's ugly. That's part of the reason for the weird way we define
`tex-mode` in `tex-mode.el` (and that was precede
> 1. Suppose that the file has %%% mode:latex as file variable. When emacs
> opens this file, it runs `latex-mode' accordingly, which in turn runs
> AUCTeX `LaTeX-mode' by redirectiton. Then it sets `major-mode' to
> `LaTeX-mode'. After that, `hack-local-variables' runs; it sees that
> `major mode
Hi Stefan and all,
> Stefan Monnier writes:
>> Then the idea of turning AUCTeX into minor mode itself does not help.
> Not necessarily, but it could if we can arrange for latex-mode and
> auctex-mode not to collide in their keymaps (and syntax table, ...), so
> that entries added to `latex-m
