- Original Message -
> On 25/03/15 00:41, Jeremy Eder wrote:
>
> >> we can overload the /u/centos at index.docker.io for these sort of
> >> containers. maybe this doesnt merit a /_/centos instance
> >>
> >> would that work ?
> >
> > Can you help me understand the distinction ?
>
>
> /_/
Some folks at Red Hat spent a week hacking on a new natural language test
framework[1] for testing containers. It's an improvement on the my simplistic
approach that enables collaboration while maintaining independence of
app-specific tests. If you're developing container images (and who doesn't
I reserved an organization namespace on docker hub[1]. I would like a place to
put the centos-based atomic app base image. Does this sound right until a
centos registry is up and running? If not at least it's a reserved public
namespace.
[1] https://registry.hub.docker.com/repos/projectatomic/
I'm seeing references to scriptlets like...
# for SERVICES in etcd flanneld kube-controller-manager kube-scheduler;
do echo --- $SERVICES --- ; systemctl is-active $SERVICES ;
systemctl is-enabled $SERVICES ; echo ""; done
...and...
# for SERVICES in flanneld docker kube-proxy.service
Friday we added atomicapp[1] to the project atomic organization on docker hub.
It's an automated build from Github[2].
[1] https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/projectatomic/atomicapp/
[2] https://github.com/projectatomic/atomicapp
I have been confused about what OSBS is. As far as I can tell it's client
tooling[1] that uses OpenShift v3. In other words, is OSBS just a way to
*use* OpenShift? If so, how could we have a roadmap for "using" something?
So this is a way to pile on Adam's request for some clarification on what
OS
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>
> On 11/27/2015 06:31 AM, Vaclav Pavlin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Stephen C. Tweedie <
> s...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 16:47 -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>> > I have had a few discuss
I have longed to see projectatomic.io mature to the point of providing a
meaningful quickstart experience. For the CDK/ADB this[1] is good
inspiration. I would like to see something like this for Atomic Registry
and Atomic Enterprise Platform as well.
[1] https://www.openshift.org/vm/
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Aaron Weitekamp wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Matt Micene"
>> > To: "Jonathan Lebon"
>> > Cc: "
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Matt Micene"
> > To: "Jonathan Lebon"
> > Cc: "atomic-devel" , "container-tools" <
> container-to...@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 12:48:59 PM
> > Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Land
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> I've been thinking about the website and some improvements/changes we
> could make. I don't quite have the web skills to do this myself, but
> hoping to start some discussion and get someone involved who does =)
>
> * First, rather than hav
We need to support asciidoc for serious (lengthy) documentation use cases.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 03/04/2016 12:09 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>
>> On 03/04/2016 02:24 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>>> Out of all the Atomic projects, what are people using for docs? Is
Josh, I'm working on documentation for atomic registry. The tool I'm using
[1] generates a complete set of docs (html, css, etc) and there is
automation in place to build the docs nightly. The content will not live in
the projectatomic/atomic-site repo so we need to decide mechanics on how to
publi
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Micah Abbott wrote:
> Hi folks-
>
> At my $DAYJOB, I do QE for RHEL Atomic Host. We have a collection of
> automation that we use to test releases and I was tasked on moving those
> tests upstream [1][2].
>
> The tests were originally developed using UATFramework
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Tom McKay wrote:
>
> I would like to allow katello[1] full API access to atomic registry. I
> don't want to turn off authentication for regular registry users, I just
> need to allow another tool full "admin" access.
>
>
The full API documentation is here[1]. I r
Openshift recently added support for compose files.
https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/7690
Hi all,
We are working on a docker-compose to kubernetes / openshift
conversion tool and would like to open a public repository for the
name "henge" (temp name) for people to contribute to.
The curre
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Matt Micene wrote:
> On 05/23/2016 02:44 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> On 05/23/2016 06:03 AM, Preeti Chandrashekar wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> In line with our ongoing efforts at streamlining the docs process, and
>>> in order to ensure better upstream-downstream
Based on feedback that Atomic Registry was overly complex to configure and
maintain, I have provided a simplified systemd-based deployment method[1].
Install/config docs[2] will be updated ASAP to reflect this. Until then the
source README should be sufficient to get you going.
Feedback encourage
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Tom McKay wrote:
> I too have a desire to do some work (hacking) on atomic registry. I
> managed to compile dockerregistry, update the image, update atomic registry
> conf to use my new image, and restart everything. I wondered, though, what
> a real dev would do?
On Jul 13, 2016 11:53 AM, "Josh Berkus" wrote:
>
> I'd like to replace Registry on the home page, because (a) it's not new
> anymore and (b) it's not really ready to install if you're not using the
> rest of openshift.
What do you mean? This is by far the newest tech on the site. The current
inst
This is a common use case that we need to demonstrate. If possible, please
report back here with the approach.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Brent Baude wrote:
> Justin,
>
> Contact me on internal IRC (baude) and perhaps we can find a solution
> for you. I need to understand your environment
Check out the integration guide[1] published to help explain the container
image signing capabilities recently introduced to the distros.
[1] https://access.redhat.com/articles/2750891
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 11/29/2016 05:16 AM, Aaron Weitekamp wrote:
> > Check out the integration guide[1] published to help explain the
> > container image signing capabilities recently introduced to the distros.
> >
> > [1] https:/
I have a use case where from inside a container I want to pull down
another container and mount as a rootfs in a tempdir. When doing this
inside a container I get permissions denied[1] on the bindmount. Otherwise
it appears to mount fine.
I have no host privilege added to this container--just runn
There's a known issue with the atomic registry installer that has not been
identified or fixed yet. For now I recommend following the stand-alone
registry installation based on the OpenShift documentation[1]. It's the
same codebase but the deployment is a better support method.
[1]
https://docs.op
I have no issue with removing these. Sadly I am connected in some way to
all of these projects. Sigh...
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:07 PM Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> Per the community meeting today, I will be purging obsolete images from
> the /projectatomic/ namespace on Dockerhub. By my view,
26 matches
Mail list logo
