[atomic-devel] Fedora 24 Atomic Images

2016-07-05 Thread Charlie Drage
I found the mail chain in regards to upgrading from Atomic 23 to Atomic 24 host via https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Atomic_Host_upgrade However, I find that getfedora.org Atomic Images aren't available yet at https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/ any ideas? Or has it just not been released yet?

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora 24 Atomic Images

2016-07-05 Thread Josh Berkus
On 07/05/2016 06:50 AM, Charlie Drage wrote: > I found the mail chain in regards to upgrading from Atomic 23 to > Atomic 24 host via https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Atomic_Host_upgrade > > However, I find that getfedora.org Atomic Images aren't available yet > at https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/down

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora 24 Atomic Images

2016-07-05 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > > There's an issue with the mirrors; it started at Summit, and apparently > hasn't been resolved. Do we have a ticket open for this, or...? -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jz

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora 24 Atomic Images

2016-07-05 Thread Josh Berkus
On 07/05/2016 10:07 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: >> >> There's an issue with the mirrors; it started at Summit, and apparently >> hasn't been resolved. > > > Do we have a ticket open for this, or...? > Don't know. Adam said he was on top of i

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora 24 Atomic Images

2016-07-05 Thread Josh Berkus
On 07/05/2016 10:09 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 07/05/2016 10:07 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: >>> >>> There's an issue with the mirrors; it started at Summit, and apparently >>> hasn't been resolved. >> >> >> Do we have a ticket open for this, or

Re: [atomic-devel] A new policy rpm for Atomic?

2016-07-05 Thread Colin Walters
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016, at 05:04 AM, Miroslav Grepl wrote: > So we could start to discuss how it is possible to ship new policy on > Atomic to solve these urgent issues. As far as I see, the mac_admin issue (and the missing domain transition from init_t for install_exec_t) has nothing to do with a