On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:00:31PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> Can you improve the commit message? It currently is mostly "what"
> but not much "why" (and the subject line should be imperative tense matching
> the rest of the style).
> Something like:
>
> ```
> manifest: Add requirements for
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015, at 02:13 PM, Charlie Drage wrote:
> I'm working on docker-machine integration for atomic host's. The
> problem I'm facing is the fact that "atomic" isn't defined under
> /etc/os-release, it's simply "fedora" or "centos" as the id.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12
On 11/12/2015 05:37 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On 11/12/2015 05:17 PM, Michael McGrath wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Amanda Carter
wrote:
Adding the list. Both questions still open.
IMHO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276775 is a blocker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
On 11/13/2015 10:03 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 11/12/2015 05:37 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/12/2015 05:17 PM, Michael McGrath wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Amanda Carter
>>> wrote:
Adding the list. Both questions still open.
>>> IMHO https://bugzilla.redhat.c
Please test and add karma:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-b26290fd1e
On 11/12/2015 06:19 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> We've been having conversations recently about the current
> architecture of Atomicapp and the way we have envisioned people using
> it. I prepared a presentation for a meeting we had today about this
> and was asked to share it with atomic
- Original Message -
> From: "Daniel J Walsh"
> To: "Dusty Mabe" , atomic-devel@projectatomic.io,
> container-to...@redhat.com
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 8:40:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] AtomicApp/Nulecule Design and Workflow
>
>
>
> On 11/12/2015 06:19 PM, Dusty Mabe
Personally I'm on the fence on whether or not we should have two
different CLI's, however, as Dan Walsh pointed out. It's confusing
having two similarly named CLIs.
However... we should still keep the projects separate and rather
"bridge" the two together by passing / using the atomicapp container
