On Wed, Sep 16, 2015, at 07:23 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
> We don't want to encourage local host paths in the future. For now it's fine
Are you planning to use Docker volumes then? Or how else to enable persistence
in the single-host scenario?
(reads farther down)
> The bulk will move into e
> On Sep 17, 2015, at 10:03 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015, at 07:23 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
>>
>> We don't want to encourage local host paths in the future. For now it's fine
>
> Are you planning to use Docker volumes then? Or how else to enable
> persistence
> in the si
> On Sep 17, 2015, at 10:03 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015, at 07:23 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
>>
>> We don't want to encourage local host paths in the future. For now it's fine
>
> Are you planning to use Docker volumes then? Or how else to enable
> persistence
> in the si
Hi,
I saw this land:
https://github.com/projectatomic/ContainerApplicationGenericLabels/blob/master/vendor/redhat/labels.md
Does anyone know more about this? Is this declared stable now?
On 09/17/2015 11:02 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw this land:
> https://github.com/projectatomic/ContainerApplicationGenericLabels/blob/master/vendor/redhat/labels.md
>
> Does anyone know more about this? Is this declared stable now?
>
I am not sure it is stable, (Since there were mult
