On 04/13/2016 05:50 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
- is there any roadmap or clear priorities, planed deadlines etc?
With respect to the RH product roadmap - we do have a public view of the
roadmap of what we are planning from a RH product release perspective.
https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/rele
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> hi,
> i see that the atomic devel list is very active many people working on
> many things and probably there are some clear directions and goals, but
> it's not really clear for outsiders. imho it'd be very useful to clarify
> a few things:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016, at 07:42 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>
> the question here is "centos atomic" a rebuild of "redhat atomic" or
> it's not that simple?
The current one that's promoted is the Core SIG rebuild, yes. I would
also like to put more effort behind the SIG work.
> the most important c
On 04/13/2016 04:53 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>> - is the atomic project (mainly the centos part) is independent of
>> redhat atomic or it's just a rebuild of redhat atomic (similar to
>> redhat->centos).
>
> There are two aspects to CentOS, and indeed this is very confusing.
> See:
>
> https://wi
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016, at 05:50 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> hi,
> i see that the atomic devel list is very active many people working on
> many things and probably there are some clear directions and goals, but
> it's not really clear for outsiders. imho it'd be very useful to clarify
> a few things
