On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 05:02 PM, Mark Dyer wrote:
> Thanks for getting back to me.
>
> If you can give me hints on where to look in the code base, I would be
> happy to look into adding package version support.
Let's discuss this in
https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/390
Thanks for getting back to me.
If you can give me hints on where to look in the code base, I would be
happy to look into adding package version support. (with the caveat that if
we come up with a work around it will be a lower priority for me too.)
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Colin Walter
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016, at 05:07 PM, Mark Dyer wrote:
> We considered making mirrors of all the repos with just the versions
> of packages that we want, but there were concerns about being able to
> go back to older versions and /or the complexity of maintaining yum
> mirrors for every version we rele
We considered making mirrors of all the repos with just the versions of
packages that we want, but there were concerns about being able to go back
to older versions and /or the complexity of maintaining yum mirrors for
every version we release.
On Friday, July 1, 2016, Jason Brooks wrote:
> On F
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Mark Dyer wrote:
> We are evaluating Atomic Host, but our development has been knocked on its
> ear several times by upstream changes to Atomic Host and friends. We need a
> way to compose trees and be assured that we are getting a specific, already
> tested collec
