Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Container Release

2018-03-23 Thread Clement Verna
> The Fedora version names crept in there as a result of a > miscommunication, I think. I expected us to use tags or other metadata > for the base Fedora version. I don't think we really want that in the > path. Thanks for the input and the feedback. I will look at what we can do to remove the Fe

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Container Release

2018-03-22 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:44:05AM -0400, Stephen Milner wrote: > > The Fedora version names crept in there as a result of a > > miscommunication, I think. I expected us to use tags or other metadata > > for the base Fedora version. I don't think we really want that in the > > path. > Ah, that make

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Container Release

2018-03-22 Thread Stephen Milner
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:24:06AM +0100, Clement Verna wrote: >> I also feel that having to specify the version fedora during the pull >> is not a very nice user experience. (ie docker pull >> registry.fedoraproject.org/f27/nginx) >> Somet

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Container Release

2018-03-22 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:24:06AM +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > I also feel that having to specify the version fedora during the pull > is not a very nice user experience. (ie docker pull > registry.fedoraproject.org/f27/nginx) > Something more user friendly would be docker pull > registry.fedorap

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Container Release

2018-03-20 Thread Stephen Milner
On Mar 20, 2018 5:24 AM, "Clement Verna" wrote: Thanks all for the feedbacks, I am 100% behind the idea that, the end user does not care about which fedora base image is used (as long as he trust that patch and security fixes are applied). If I want to use the nginx container for example as a us

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Container Release

2018-03-20 Thread Clement Verna
Thanks all for the feedbacks, I am 100% behind the idea that, the end user does not care about which fedora base image is used (as long as he trust that patch and security fixes are applied). If I want to use the nginx container for example as a user I am more interested in the version of nginx th

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Container Release

2018-03-19 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 03/19/2018 04:30 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, at 3:38 PM, Clement Verna wrote: > >> So if you maintain a container could you please build your container >> against the f28 and master branch. Everyone please keep in mind that Clement is a new team member and is inher

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Container Release

2018-03-19 Thread Stephen Milner
Thanks for the note Clement. Inline... On Mar 19, 2018 4:31 PM, "Colin Walters" wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, at 3:38 PM, Clement Verna wrote: > So if you maintain a container could you please build your container > against the f28 and master branch. There's a fairly important deeper question

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Container Release

2018-03-19 Thread Colin Walters
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, at 3:38 PM, Clement Verna wrote: > So if you maintain a container could you please build your container > against the f28 and master branch. There's a fairly important deeper question here: Do we really want to build all of these containers against each fedora release? Do