On 11/16/2015 03:17 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 11/13/2015 11:40 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>
>> On 11/12/2015 06:19 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>> Hey All,
>>>
>>> We've been having conversations recently about the current
>>> architecture of Atomicapp and the way we have envisioned people using
>
On 11/13/2015 11:40 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 11/12/2015 06:19 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Hey All,
We've been having conversations recently about the current
architecture of Atomicapp and the way we have envisioned people using
it. I prepared a presentation for a meeting we had today about thi
ot;Dusty Mabe" , atomic-devel@projectatomic.io,
> > container-to...@redhat.com
> > Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 8:40:07 AM
> > Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] AtomicApp/Nulecule Design and Workflow
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/12/2015 06:19 PM, Dusty Mabe w
- Original Message -
> From: "Daniel J Walsh"
> To: "Dusty Mabe" , atomic-devel@projectatomic.io,
> container-to...@redhat.com
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 8:40:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] AtomicApp/Nulecule Design and Workflow
>
>
On 11/12/2015 06:19 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> We've been having conversations recently about the current
> architecture of Atomicapp and the way we have envisioned people using
> it. I prepared a presentation for a meeting we had today about this
> and was asked to share it with atomic