Re: [atomic-devel] [Container-tools] AtomicApp/Nulecule Design and Workflow

2015-12-04 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 12/04/2015 12:56 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: On Nov 23, 2015, at 8:17 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> >> On 11/22/2015 11:09 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: >>> >>> 2) Could argument parsing in Atomic CLI be made more flexible than the current OPT system? Could the parser learn how to

Re: [atomic-devel] [Container-tools] AtomicApp/Nulecule Design and Workflow

2015-12-04 Thread Brian (bex) Exelbierd
On Nov 23, 2015, at 8:17 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > > > On 11/22/2015 11:09 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: >>> On Nov 13, 2015, at 7:19 PM, Charlie Drage wrote: >>> >>> Personally I'm on the fence on whether or not we should have two >>> different CLI's, however, as Dan Walsh pointed out

Re: [atomic-devel] [Container-tools] AtomicApp/Nulecule Design and Workflow

2015-11-23 Thread Daniel J Walsh
On 11/22/2015 11:09 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: >> On Nov 13, 2015, at 7:19 PM, Charlie Drage wrote: >> >> Personally I'm on the fence on whether or not we should have two >> different CLI's, however, as Dan Walsh pointed out. It's confusing >> having two similarly named CLIs. >> >> However

Re: [atomic-devel] [Container-tools] AtomicApp/Nulecule Design and Workflow

2015-11-22 Thread Vaclav Pavlin
On 22 Nov 2015 17:21, "Brian (bex) Exelbierd" wrote: > > >> On Nov 22, 2015, at 5:13 PM, Vaclav Pavlin wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: >>> >>> >>> > On Nov 13, 2015, at 7:19 PM, Charlie Drage wrote: >>> > >>> > Personally I'm on the fence on whet

Re: [atomic-devel] [Container-tools] AtomicApp/Nulecule Design and Workflow

2015-11-22 Thread Brian (bex) Exelbierd
> On Nov 22, 2015, at 5:13 PM, Vaclav Pavlin wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd > wrote: > > > On Nov 13, 2015, at 7:19 PM, Charlie Drage > > wrote: > > > > Personally I'm on the fence on whether or not we s

Re: [atomic-devel] [Container-tools] AtomicApp/Nulecule Design and Workflow

2015-11-22 Thread Vaclav Pavlin
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: > > > On Nov 13, 2015, at 7:19 PM, Charlie Drage wrote: > > > > Personally I'm on the fence on whether or not we should have two > > different CLI's, however, as Dan Walsh pointed out. It's confusing > > having two similarly named CLI

Re: [atomic-devel] [Container-tools] AtomicApp/Nulecule Design and Workflow

2015-11-22 Thread Brian (bex) Exelbierd
> On Nov 13, 2015, at 7:19 PM, Charlie Drage wrote: > > Personally I'm on the fence on whether or not we should have two > different CLI's, however, as Dan Walsh pointed out. It's confusing > having two similarly named CLIs. > > However... we should still keep the projects separate and rather >

Re: [atomic-devel] [Container-tools] AtomicApp/Nulecule Design and Workflow

2015-11-15 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 14 November 2015 at 04:19, Charlie Drage wrote: > Personally I'm on the fence on whether or not we should have two > different CLI's, however, as Dan Walsh pointed out. It's confusing > having two similarly named CLIs. I don't have any opinion at all on the technical details of this, but I do