On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 10:28:38AM -0400, Jason Brooks wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar
> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 08:47:12AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 05/09/2016 08:18 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
> >> > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Lokesh Ma
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:22:30PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016, at 10:24 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
>
> > The RH patchset will be the same for both Fedora and RHEL, just that RHEL
> > could have approaches (like docker and docker-latest)
> > Fedora would never agree to
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016, at 10:24 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> The RH patchset will be the same for both Fedora and RHEL, just that RHEL
> could have approaches (like docker and docker-latest)
> Fedora would never agree to.
I think we *could* do this in Fedora...but a big question here is, do we *
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 08:47:12AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>
> On 05/09/2016 08:18 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
> > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar
> > wrote:
> > > **CentOS Virt SIG**
> > >
> > > What:
> > > - 'docker' (v1.9) http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=108
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar
wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 08:47:12AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/09/2016 08:18 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>> > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar
>> > wrote:
>> > > **CentOS Virt SIG**
>> > >
>> > > What:
>> > >
Probably best on Centos, we could probably use a blog on projectatomic also.
On 05/11/2016 10:56 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 05:18:46PM -0700, Jason Brooks wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
**CentOS Virt SIG**
What:
- 'docker' (v1.9) http
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 05:18:46PM -0700, Jason Brooks wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar
> wrote:
> > **CentOS Virt SIG**
> >
> > What:
> > - 'docker' (v1.9) http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10878
> > - 'docker-latest' (v1.10) http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildin
On Tue, May 10, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Erik Swanson (eriswans) wrote:
> The assumption of /usr/bin/docker being a self-contained(-ish) binary
> guaranteed to be compatible with the running daemon’s socket isn’t entirely
> uncommon: A quick google search for “-v /usr/bin/docker:” shows ~1670
> resul
On 05/10/2016 12:06 PM, Erik Swanson (eriswans) wrote:
On May 10, 2016, at 05:48, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 05/09/2016 07:38 PM, Erik Swanson (eriswans) wrote:
On May 9, 2016, at 07:54, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
- /usr/bin/docker is a script which execs /usr/bin/docker-current (v1.9) or
/
> On May 10, 2016, at 05:48, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> On 05/09/2016 07:38 PM, Erik Swanson (eriswans) wrote:
>>> On May 9, 2016, at 07:54, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
>>>
>>> - /usr/bin/docker is a script which execs /usr/bin/docker-current (v1.9) or
>>> /usr/bin/docker-latest (v1.10) based on
On 05/09/2016 07:38 PM, Erik Swanson (eriswans) wrote:
On May 9, 2016, at 07:54, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
- /usr/bin/docker is a script which execs /usr/bin/docker-current (v1.9) or
/usr/bin/docker-latest (v1.10) based on what $DOCKERBINARY is set to.
Too late (or wrong forum?) perhaps, but
On 05/09/2016 08:18 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
**CentOS Virt SIG**
What:
- 'docker' (v1.9) http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10878
- 'docker-latest' (v1.10) http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10881
- both can be instal
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> **CentOS Virt SIG**
>
> What:
> - 'docker' (v1.9) http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10878
> - 'docker-latest' (v1.10) http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10881
> - both can be installed simultaneously and don't step on e
> On May 9, 2016, at 07:54, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
>
> - /usr/bin/docker is a script which execs /usr/bin/docker-current (v1.9) or
> /usr/bin/docker-latest (v1.10) based on what $DOCKERBINARY is set to.
Too late (or wrong forum?) perhaps, but this split is very distressing to me as
an end-us
On Mon, May 9, 2016, at 10:54 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> **CentOS Virt SIG**
>
> What:
> - 'docker' (v1.9) http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10878
> - 'docker-latest' (v1.10) http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10881
> - both can be installed simultaneously and don't step
**CentOS Virt SIG**
What:
- 'docker' (v1.9) http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10878
- 'docker-latest' (v1.10) http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10881
- both can be installed simultaneously and don't step on each other's toes,
but only one can run at a time.
- /usr/bin/docke
16 matches
Mail list logo