Colin Walters writes:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016, at 04:37 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> if I understand things right, adding storaged as a dependency to
>> cockpit-docker is not acceptable. Can I add python-pyudev instead?
>>
>> Incidentall, what about NetworkManager-team?
>
> We have a f
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016, at 04:37 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if I understand things right, adding storaged as a dependency to
> cockpit-docker is not acceptable. Can I add python-pyudev instead?
>
> Incidentall, what about NetworkManager-team?
We have a few conflicting masters here:
-
Stef Walter writes:
> About pyudev ... I would suggest that functionality we're starting to
> use it for (such as monitoring for storage devices, and listing their
> properties) should go into the 'atomic storage' subcommand. If it needs
> python-pyudev to make that work, then it makes sense to i
On 16.06.2016 10:37, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if I understand things right, adding storaged as a dependency to
> cockpit-docker is not acceptable. Can I add python-pyudev instead?
>
> Incidentall, what about NetworkManager-team?
So long term, the goal for Cockpit should be to run more in
Hi,
if I understand things right, adding storaged as a dependency to
cockpit-docker is not acceptable. Can I add python-pyudev instead?
Incidentall, what about NetworkManager-team?
