On 01/17/2017 11:26 AM, Stef Walter wrote:
>
> Indeed. We'll be releasing Cockpit 129 shortly, which will include an
> Obsoletes directive in the RPM and should fix this issue. Sorry for the
> breakage.
No worries. Glad I saw it and we plan on detecting this sort of thing
in the future.
Dusty
On 01/15/2017 04:03 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> I noticed today when comparing two trees, one from Dec25 and the
> latest one, that the version of cockpit went backwards.
>
> !cockpit-bridge-126-1.fc25.x86_64
> =cockpit-bridge-120-1.fc25.x86_64
> !cockpit-docker-126-1.fc25.x86_64
> =cockpit-docke
On 15.01.2017 22:03, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> I noticed today when comparing two trees, one from Dec25 and the
> latest one, that the version of cockpit went backwards.
>
> !cockpit-bridge-126-1.fc25.x86_64
> =cockpit-bridge-120-1.fc25.x86_64
> !cockpit-docker-126-1.fc25.x86_64
> =cockpit-docker-120
I noticed today when comparing two trees, one from Dec25 and the
latest one, that the version of cockpit went backwards.
!cockpit-bridge-126-1.fc25.x86_64
=cockpit-bridge-120-1.fc25.x86_64
!cockpit-docker-126-1.fc25.x86_64
=cockpit-docker-120-1.fc25.x86_64
!cockpit-networkmanager-126-1.fc25.noarc
