Re: [atomic-devel] Info regarding process for generating [custom] ISO

On 2/18/20 9:39 AM, Ananthu R V wrote: > Hi Dusty,  > > Thanks for the update.  We were looking at more of a remix which can passed > on and used by a wider set of people.  > > Do you think Kickstart approach will work this? My understanding is that for > this to work the iso has to be modif

Re: [atomic-devel] Info regarding process for generating [custom] ISO

On 2/18/20 2:08 AM, Viraj Patil wrote: > Howdy Devs, > > We are looking for some help in generating ISO's of custom silverblue OS. We > were not able to find any docs pertaining to this.But landed on a few older > ones >

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Nearing End Of Life

On 11/25/19 11:41 AM, Normand wrote: > > > On 11/21/19 11:33 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> This content also exists at: >> https://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2019/11/fedora-atomic-host-nearing-eol/ >> >> Last year we [introduced the plans for Fedora CoreOS] [1

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Nearing End Of Life

This content also exists at: https://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2019/11/fedora-atomic-host-nearing-eol/ Last year we [introduced the plans for Fedora CoreOS] [1] including that Fedora CoreOS would be the successor to Fedora Atomic Host and Container Linux (from CoreOS Inc.). As part of that succe

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20191001.0

On 10/2/19 5:25 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 29.20191001.0 > Commit(x86_64): > 15b8a10f8b587c2a037a592806dc04e9cdf6ab1c73c6e49fdaacab1b1174b9ab > Commit(aarch64): > 2b83282e976249b8e1910a7292379753b00

Re: [atomic-devel] [atomic-announce] Fedora Atomic 29 EOL date?

On 8/24/19 6:27 AM, Feilong Wang wrote: > Hi team, > Hi Feilong! I'm adding in Spyros who has worked with us in the past on Atomic Host and Magnum. > Could you please help me understand when will be the EOL date for Fedora > Atomic 29? I understand generally it takes 13 months. But given Fe

Re: [atomic-devel] Failed to deploy/upgrade on Fedora Atomic 29

On 7/15/19 10:33 PM, Feilong Wang wrote: > Hello, could anybody please take a look at this issue? Thanks. Hi Feilong, > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 9:43 AM Feilong Wang > wrote: > > Hi team, > > Now I'm testing upgrade for Fedora Atomic 29 image, but when I

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190625.0

On 6/25/19 1:38 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 29.20190625.0 > Commit(x86_64): > c50cc86ad7972f85853f1deafda3899eb86a0e5220c613744eed64320298716e > Commit(aarch64): > 0e82ac50808a1513cab1f8ad4c6262c091b

Re: [atomic-devel] Bootable fedora atomic host 29 for cloud(OpenStack)?

On 6/22/19 8:28 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > here > > https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/30/Cloud/x86_64/images/ Those are the fedora cloud base images. He asked for the fedora 29 atomic host cloud images. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Bootable fedora atomic host 29 for cloud(OpenStack)?

On 6/11/19 5:28 PM, Feilong Wang wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm new for the fedora atomic community, so please bear me if the question is > silly. I found there is no cloud images since FC28. So could anybody let me > know where can I get a bootable Fedora Atomic Host 29 image for cloud > (OpenS

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190516.0

On 5/16/19 6:27 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 29.20190516.0 > Commit(x86_64): > 7f719bf60b865ca96aacd0e8ae3e6074c7eb5783d8ceb9003dbba5dfd5a29ba3 > Commit(aarch64): > 3930a03b8ffcce1aa66f17b8811e2a4da80

Re: [atomic-devel] Rebase Fedora Atomic 27 > 29 fails to boot

On 3/21/19 1:17 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 3/20/19 11:41 AM, Doug Campbell wrote: >> Currently running Fedora Atomic 27.153 >> >> Following instructions at: >> http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2018/10/fedora-atomic-28-to-29-upgrade/ to >> u

Re: [atomic-devel] Rebase Fedora Atomic 27 > 29 fails to boot

On 3/20/19 11:41 AM, Doug Campbell wrote: > Currently running Fedora Atomic 27.153 > > Following instructions at: > http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2018/10/fedora-atomic-28-to-29-upgrade/ to > upgrade to version 29. > > Upon reboot everything is fine until I see: > > (1 of 2) A start job i

[atomic-devel] Removing Atomic Host from Fedora Rawhide

Hello Fedora Atomic Host users, With the switched focus to Fedora CoreOS for the future of our immmutable, container oriented operating systems the last major release of Fedora Atomic Host was Fedora 29. Considering this we are removing the builds for Fedora Atomic Host from rawhide and will no

[atomic-devel] runc CVE-2019-5736 and Atomic Host

We are planning to do a release next week with updated versions of software that don't contain the exploit. We are not doing a release this week because there are two lines of defense that block this exploit on Atomic Host: 1. /usr/ is mounted read-only 2. SELinux is enabled by default SELinux

Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic Host on Xen PV VM

On 1/22/19 1:35 PM, mabi wrote: > Hello, > > I am still trying and very interested into managing to run CentOS Atomic Host > with Xen using paravirtualization. > > What I did for now is to install in a Xen HVM VM using the Atomic Host ISO > file and now I am trying to convert this HVM into a

Re: [atomic-devel] "Hello World" - seems to be successful

On 11/19/2018 04:40 PM, Bob Gustafson wrote: > OK, moving right along - seems to work fine. so you've got everything working? > > I will try to install a few more packages before doing a reboot. > > Thanks much - Bob G

Re: [atomic-devel] Fwd: upgrade 28 to 29

On 10/31/2018 12:55 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > > > > everything is ok now, all packages are here: yay. Thanks @micah for helping out! > --- > % rpm-ostree status > State: idle > AutomaticUpdates: disabled > Deployments: > ● ostree://fedora-atomic-29:fedora/29/x86_6

[atomic-devel] Atomic Host compose based on RC 1.2 is available

FYI: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7862#comment-537918

[atomic-devel] no openshift origin less than 3.11 for Fedora 29 Atomic Host

FYI. It looks like it will not be possible to run older versions of openshift origin (also known as OKD) or kubernetes on Fedora 29 Atomic Host. A more detailed description is in https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/512 Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora 29 Atomic and Cloud Test Day on Monday, 1st October

On 09/28/2018 12:42 PM, Sinny Kumari wrote: > Hi all, > > We are organizing Atomic and Cloud Test Day on Monday, 1st October. This > Test Day is to make sure that Atomic Host and Cloud artifacts are working as > expected in Fedora 29. If something is broken, we catch it and fix them as > soon a

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180917.0

On 09/17/2018 03:19 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180917.0 > Commit(x86_64): > 17b11d74047ded1264a57555a64ae6fc5d02a332c556679bfcf32864fc91f11e > Commit(aarch64): > 95cdc6d02ed7f3645bdd513b07b2c2d

Re: [atomic-devel] Automation of Atomic management

On 09/14/2018 07:47 AM, Ovidiu Calbajos wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm not really sure if this is the place to ask this question, but > unfortunately I didn't find anywhere else. > I've been looking at CentOS atomic and how the atomic part works and I find > it really cool, but I'm a little bit st

Re: [atomic-devel] Bare metal installation without video display??

On 08/20/2018 07:48 PM, Bob Gustafson wrote: > See my reply interspersed. > > On 08/20/2018 10:26 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> On 08/19/2018 10:50 AM, Bob Gustafson wrote: >>> My particular piece of bare metal seems to have enough memory, disk >>> space, In

Re: [atomic-devel] [atomic-announce] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180816.1

On 08/20/2018 04:24 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180816.1 > Commit(x86_64): > c6b1e97b93424c260baa98518277d87f7f4ebf036c09a9a0aeb7097c33c2099c > Commit(aarch64): > 28d35c25fecb561a648ef1f3be30906

Re: [atomic-devel] Bare metal installation without video display??

On 08/19/2018 10:50 AM, Bob Gustafson wrote: > My particular piece of bare metal seems to have enough memory, disk > space, Intel x86_64 architecture w/4 cores, ethernet nics, but it does > not have any video support. > > I can move data using ethernet, but user interaction during install mus

Re: [atomic-devel] socat package has gone away

On 08/06/2018 07:54 PM, Jonathan Rogers wrote: > The "socat" package has been included in CentOS Atomic until very > recently. I see it in 7.1803, but not 7.1805. Does anyone know why it > went away? I'm running a Kubernetes cluster with most of the nodes > running CentOS Atomic. Port forwarding

Re: [atomic-devel] [CoreOS] Re: Re: Starting a Container SIG

On 07/31/2018 08:29 AM, Clement Verna wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 13:38, Sanja Bonic wrote: >> >> For search and threaded visibility, it would be useful to have these >> discussions happen on the forums (created a category, let's see if we use >> it: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/c

Re: [atomic-devel] Starting a Container SIG

On 07/25/2018 01:09 PM, Clement Verna wrote: > > Please Reply if you're interested with helping out making the > Container story great in Fedora. If there is a good response, I will > create a Container SIG wiki page, and I guess we can ask for > container-devel mailing list for SIG discussions

Re: [atomic-devel] fedora 28 atomic workstation

On 07/23/2018 07:45 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > I installed Fedora 28 atomic workstation from team silverblue website[0]. I > already run atomic on my servers and wanted to see how looks the Silverblue > project. > > After some partitioning issues (dual boot with w10) I now run the > worksta

Re: [atomic-devel] Canceling atomic-wg-apac meeting for 10th July and maybe future meetings as well?

On 07/10/2018 10:35 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Sanja Bonic > wrote: > > Let's schedule the first Fedora CoreOS APAC meeting for the week after > DevConf.in - same time and in #fedora-meeting-1? > > > Devconf.in is on August

Re: [atomic-devel] Announcing the Fedora CoreOS community!

On 06/20/2018 04:52 PM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: > ср, 20 июн. 2018 г. в 17:11, Dusty Mabe : > # What does this mean for Atomic Host? > > The last major release of Fedora Atomic Host will most likely be Fedora > 29 Atomic Host. After Fedora 29 we'll recommend you use Fed

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-06-20

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-06-20/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-06-20-16.30.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-06-20/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-06-20-16.30.txt Log: https://meetbo

[atomic-devel] Announcing the Fedora CoreOS community!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Everyone! Earlier this year Red Hat acquired CoreOS, Inc. [1]. In the past few months we have been working hard to evaluate the different technologies in the CoreOS Container Linux and Project Atomic spaces. Since Container Linux and Atomic Hos

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180613.0

On 06/13/2018 06:23 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180613.0 > Commit(x86_64): > c51100f14cf12b25c16562cede7455191e536c0534e3b2ef87e66be9e12899ae > Commit(aarch64): > 5492bb19612e4c9e4f93c63e0af81e6

Re: [atomic-devel] different package versions on similar machines

On 06/11/2018 11:06 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > yes there are some diff: > > Updated machine: > > - > root@control2➤➤ ~ # rpm-ostree status -v > State: idle; auto updates disabled > Deployments: > ● ostree://fedora-atomic:fedora/28/x86_64/upd

Re: [atomic-devel] essential directories to backup with rsync

On 06/08/2018 08:48 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > I used to make local backup of my cluster machines with rsync. I run a > systemd service file + a timer to rsync folder contents, with of course some > excludes. > > I would like to do same with atomic machines, but I am too new with the > file

Re: [atomic-devel] different package versions on similar machines

On 06/11/2018 08:36 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > I set up two Fedora atomic machines recently absolutely the same way (same > etc settings, same added packages...). They could have been rsync'ed. > > For unknown reasons, some packages don't have same versions. Some examples: > cockpit-docker.x8

Re: [atomic-devel] docker storage LVM thin pool

On 06/05/2018 03:39 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > I followed the various guides to create a LVM thin pool storage volume using > the helper script container-storage-setup. > > Here is the result: > > > # lsblk > NAME  MAJ:MIN RM  SIZE RO TYPE MOU

Re: [atomic-devel] Upgrade from kubernetes-apiserver to kubernetes-sig-apiserver

On 05/31/2018 02:05 PM, Rares Vernica wrote: > I just realized that my problem is related to atomic host update: > > # atomic host status > State: idle > Deployments: > ● ostree://centos-atomic-host:centos-atomic-host/7/x86_64/standard >    Version: 7.1804 (2018-05-21 20:57:24)

Re: [atomic-devel] forbidden base package replacement

On 05/31/2018 08:04 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > In order to create a Kubernetes cluster, I want to downgrade docker to > docker-ce-17.03. > > I uninstalled successfully current docker version with some dependencies with > the following command: > > -- > # rpm-ostr

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-05-30

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-05-30/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-05-30-16.30.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-05-30/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-05-30-16.30.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-05-30/fed

Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic as Base OS for Standalone Appliance

On 05/30/2018 09:52 AM, Scott McCarty wrote: > > My apologies, I just had this sitting in my inbox forever and didn't see > a response. I get that subconscious stressful feeling when I know there > are unanswered questions on a mailing anywhere the Internet ;-) >> I get the same feeling. No

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180527.0

On 05/29/2018 03:06 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180527.0 > Commit(x86_64): > 291ea90da29bc5abe757b5a50813b3de1396b08412939a89b3b671aba9856093 > Commit(aarch64): > f3f1b43c6bb1fa705d36f4e2b470e1d

Re: [atomic-devel] 2wk atomic release candidate: 20180528

On 05/28/2018 10:57 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote: > Hi all, > > We have new Release Candidate available for testing which contains > updated kernel with fixes for CVE-2018-3639. > > We will attempt to release the 20180528 images tomorrow. > These images contain the following ostree version/commits >

Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic as Base OS for Standalone Appliance

On 05/25/2018 04:34 PM, Scott McCarty wrote: > Shane, > >     I see nobody has responded. To be honest, I read your email three > times, and I can't quite figure out your use case. I am guessing others > may be heads down working on the new Red Hat CoreOS and hence haven't > had time to dig

Re: [atomic-devel] [atomic] rebuild atomic fedora image

moving to atomic-devel list On 05/25/2018 10:37 AM, SysAdmin COUSIN wrote: > Hi , > > I need to rebuild Fedora atomic image to trust some root CA. How can I use > it, with user-data ? I need to use it with OpenStack Magnum. You can build your own this way: http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2017

Re: [atomic-devel] Out of disk space

On 05/24/2018 07:58 PM, Rares Vernica wrote: > Hello, > > I have a recently installed Atomic CentOS bare-metal server. I have about 3TB > of physical disk available on it: > > # pvdisplay >   --- Physical volume --- >   PV Name   /dev/sda2 >   VG Name   cah_b >   PV Siz

Re: [atomic-devel] [atomic] Atomic Centos PXE Installation

On 05/24/2018 09:26 AM, Joaquin Henriquez wrote: > Discover that a minimum of 4GB needs to be added to the machine. > Did that fix everything for you?

Re: [atomic-devel] [atomic] Atomic Centos PXE Installation

Adding in atomic-devel to the loop here, as that has a much larger audience I would suspect. Please cc on future messages. On 05/23/2018 04:54 PM, Jonathan Lebon wrote: > Hi Joaquin, > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Joaquin Henriquez > wrote: >> Trying to Kickstart an Atomic Centos (latest i

Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic as Base OS for Standalone Appliance

On 05/21/2018 03:09 PM, Shane O'Donnell wrote: > Hey All – > Hey Shane. I think walters answered most of your questions already but I'm glad to see you around in the community! > >   > > P.S.  If you’re in the Raleigh, NC area, I’d happily buy lunch or a beer (or > both!) for a chance to pi

Re: [atomic-devel] Question about Docker Storage

On 05/17/2018 09:54 AM, Chad Tindel wrote: > Hi- Hi Chad > > I am getting errors like this: > > /usr/bin/docker-current: failed to register layer: devmapper: Thin Pool has > 521 free data blocks which is less than minimum required 549 free data > blocks. Create more free space in thin pool

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180515.1

On 05/16/2018 02:03 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180515.1 > Commit(x86_64): > a29367c58417c28e2bd8306c1f438b934df79eba13706e078fe8564d9e0eb32b > Commit(aarch64): > ec501e5a6833e6117632c3a7fc90ef17

Re: [atomic-devel] [atomic] password and user atomic project

Moving this to the atomic devel mailing list. On 05/16/2018 05:03 AM, Angelo Campanozzi wrote: > What password and user use to access on fedora-atomic? > I assume you're talking about cloud images here. The cloud images use cloud-init user-data (provided by you) to set a password or an SSH key f

[atomic-devel] Updates for dhcp client issue: CVE-2018-1111

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567974 We have a new release coming in the morning but for anyone anxious to get up and running now you can rebase to the updates branch in order to go ahead and grab the new content. An example is: # r

Re: [atomic-devel] Failed to start Docker Storage Setup

On 05/15/2018 07:44 PM, Rares Vernica wrote: > Hi, > > I installed the latest CentOS image on bare metal. Docker seems to work fine, > but I get an error message at start-up about the docker-storage-setup service > failing to start. I am happy with the current Docker storage setup, I just > w

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180425.0

A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: Version: 28.20180425.0 Commit(x86_64): 94a9d06eef34aa6774c056356d3d2e024e57a0013b6f8048dbae392a84a137ca Commit(aarch64): 12a95314084eaa2242bdfe24197774aac163433d2405bc2813b4d89180434630 Commit(ppc64le): d29c4549226ca8a50846360cf

Re: [atomic-devel] Podman-0.4.4 was just releeased.

On 04/28/2018 04:51 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote: > This version no longer  requires the Buildah package to be installed but > can still do podman builds.  It is 36 Mb in size and I believe should > now be considered for inclusion into the atomic host by default as a > container runtime. > That's

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora 28 Atoimic Host RC 1.1 available for testing

On 04/26/2018 08:54 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 2:05 AM, Dusty Mabe <mailto:du...@dustymabe.com>> wrote: > > The Atomic Host compose based on RC 1.1 is available for testing now. > > The toplevel directory is: > https://kojipkgs.

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora 28 Atoimic Host RC 1.1 available for testing

On 04/25/2018 04:58 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, at 4:35 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> The Atomic Host compose based on RC 1.1 is available for testing now. >>

[atomic-devel] Fedora 28 Atoimic Host RC 1.1 available for testing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 The Atomic Host compose based on RC 1.1 is available for testing now. The toplevel directory is: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/Fedora-Atomic-28-20180425.0 The cloud images are under the compose/AtomicHost/$arch/images/ directo

Re: [atomic-devel] Newbie atomic questions continued

On 04/20/2018 11:41 AM, Chad Tindel wrote: > Dusty- > > Unfortunately I had signed up for the digest so there's no way to reply, I > fixed that problem moving forward. > >> I not as familiar with packer. Does it run a kickstart install?  > > No, it starts up an ec2 instance with a base AMI (a

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 27.122

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 04/19/2018 05:55 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 27.122 > Commit(x86_64): > 931ebb3941fc49af706ac5a90ad3b5a493be4ae35e85721dabbfd966b1ecbf99 > Commit(aar

Re: [atomic-devel] Newbie atomic questions

On 04/19/2018 05:03 PM, Chad Tindel wrote: Hi Chad > 1.  I do a packer build and inside that packer build I add a new systemd > service at /etc/systemd/system/update_route53_mapping.service and I systemctl > enable update_route53_mapping as well. > > I can see that that is done correctly in

[atomic-devel] using the updates-testing repo for layered packages in f28AW

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, If you are running f28 atomic workstation already then you may hit issues with layered packages [1] because the updates-testing yum repo is enabled by default in f28 (this will change once f28 final is released). Please run the following co

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Community Meeting Minutes 2018-04-03

On 04/04/2018 05:29 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 04/04/2018 02:08 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >>>> 2. I had to add a "custom" rpm to enable firmware for my laptop. Is there >>>> any work toward enabling /usr/local/lib/firmware to work? >>

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Community Meeting Minutes 2018-04-03

On 04/04/2018 12:22 PM, Sinny Kumari wrote: > >> * ksinny get answer to "is there a plan to have a local RPM repo where I >> can put custom or downloaded rpms for installation with rpm-ostree ?" > > I'm not sure what exactly the question is. This operation is very much similar > to how you wo

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Community Meeting Minutes 2018-04-03

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Thanks Sinny for running this!! I have some responses to the questions below (and some suggestions) inline: On 04/03/2018 02:10 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote: > == > #fedora-meeting-1: fedora_atomic_community >

Re: [atomic-devel] What talking points do we have for Atomic in the F28 release timeframe?

On 03/27/2018 11:06 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Do we have anything I should emphasize for beta, coming up next week? > What about in May? > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_talking_points#Fedora_Atomic I opened a ticket and asked @sanja to run it down: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/is

[atomic-devel] SElinux bug in F28 Atomic Workstation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559531 This bug prevents FAW from starting the desktop environment. If you want Atomic Workstation for F28 beta then that bug needs to be fixed ASAP. It would be a shame to miss this opportunity from a marketing perspective. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] atomic install/run cockpit does not work on atomic-ws

On 03/23/2018 11:56 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > hi, > > I've installed the latest atomic workstation on a vm > > I tried to run cockpit by typing > > atomic install registry.fedoraproject.org/f27/cockpit > > > but it gives > > cockpit-bridge m

Re: [atomic-devel] testing atomic ws on virt-manager

On 03/22/2018 07:39 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > hi, > > I'm using qemu-kvm with virt-manager on Fedora 27 > and trying to install atomic ws, from here > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-28-20180322.n.0/compose/AtomicWorkstation/x86_64/iso/ > > the installation progr

[atomic-devel] use botbot.me to log #atomic channel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/438 There has been a proposal to add a nice interface for logged messages in #atomic on freenode. Please add input to the proposal (link above). Dusty -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEPb6zG5c6sV89tRYP

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-03-21

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-03-21/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-03-21-16.30.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-03-21/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-03-21-16.30.txt Log: https://meetbot

[atomic-devel] Reminder Meeting Time is in UTC

Our Atomic Working group meeting time is in UTC so if you are in a country that has observed or will observe daylight savings make sure you adjust. The meeting will be at 16:30 UTC https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/atomic/

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Container Release

On 03/19/2018 04:30 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, at 3:38 PM, Clement Verna wrote: > >> So if you maintain a container could you please build your container >> against the f28 and master branch. Everyone please keep in mind that Clement is a new team member and is inher

Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic qcow2 image from custom tree

On 03/13/2018 01:11 AM, Clenimar Filemon wrote: > Hello folks, > Hi! > I'd like to create a custom qcow2 fedora-atomic image for some scenarios I've > been exploring with OpenStack Magnum. I basically need a fedora-atomic image > with a few extra packages installed and a few commands execute

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-03-07

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 summary: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-03-07/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-03-07-16.30.html full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-03-07/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-03-07-16.30.log.html ==

[atomic-devel] Unified ostree repositories in Fedora

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 TL;DR: If you use f27 atomic workstation or rawhide atomic host/workstation then you need to add a new remote and rebase. [f27 atomic workstation] # ostree remote add --set=gpg-verify=true --set=gpgkeypath=/etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedor

[atomic-devel] using the quay.io container registry

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I opened a ticket in the atomic working group to discuss using the quay.io container registry for some of our 'upstream' needs. Please discuss this in the ticket: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/430 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiE

[atomic-devel] march VFAD for the atomic working group

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429 In the Atomic working group in Fedora we have occasionally used virtual Fedora Activity Days (VFADs) to get the community together to discuss in a high bandwidth setting (video conference) some techical issues

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 27.93

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/27/2018 10:47 AM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 27.93 > Commit(x86_64): > da0bd968610aa1e29c5bb37065649407fbbfffa53e63831afdadbd34a3b05327 > Commit(aarc

[atomic-devel] 2wk atomic release candidate: 20180117

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Tomorrow we will attempt to release the 20180226 images. These images contain the following ostree version/commits from the Fedora-27-updates-20180225.0 updates run: Version: 27.93 Commit(x86_64): da0bd968610aa1e29c5bb37065649407fbbfffa53e63831afdad

Re: [atomic-devel] Kubernetes manual setup

On 02/21/2018 01:58 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: > > Well actually... the main way I've used these system containers is > with the ansible scripts at: > https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/tree/master/ansible but those > have been deprecated. > > I think we should: > > * drop the manual instructi

Re: [atomic-devel] Project Atomic Logo - please comment/vote

On 02/19/2018 07:38 AM, Sanja Bonic wrote: > Hi everyone, > > TL;DR: Vote on 1 | 2 | 3. > > 1: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1eVSN-bU7zNrut_taSRn4M28muIrrn8jm > 2: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WnaH8gLXZY6iqPCRdAob0a41KW4AOnyc > 3: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1mRpKPq6UhKf9wjOKhL-sr2

Re: [atomic-devel] Project Atomic Logo - please comment/vote

On 02/19/2018 01:56 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Generally speaking, I'm a big supporter of "if it didn't happen on the > mailing list, it didn't happen." Votes during real-time meetings usually mean > someone is being excluded by default because of time zones, overlapping > commitments, etc.

Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic BOF at RH Summit

On 02/15/2018 05:43 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > Folks, > > An Atomic BOF session has been confirmed for RH Summit in May. I will > be organizing it since Sanja won't be at this year's Summit. > > Who will be at RH Summit? I'd like 4-6 people to talk about various > Atomic projects before we take

Re: [atomic-devel] [atomic-announce] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/13/2018 03:02 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 27.81 > Commit(x86_64): > b25bde0109441817f912ece57ca1fc39efc60e6cef4a7a23ad9de51b1f36b742 > Commit(aarc

[atomic-devel] Top Issues facing our Atomic Host users

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 - From the past few months we've had a lot of community involvement in IRC and on the mailing lists. Over that time there are some re-occurring issues that keep coming up. - - Lost content in /etc/ problem - https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-

[atomic-devel] Atomic Host/Workstation Interview for Linux Unplugged Podcast

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 A couple of us went on the LUP podcast this week to talk about Atomic Host/Workstation. Check it out: https://twitter.com/jupitersignal/status/961283877883977728. We start around minute 16:20. Dusty -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFi

[atomic-devel] Nice post from mclasen on First steps with atomic workstation

Check it out: https://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2018/02/08/first-steps-with-fedora-atomic-workstation/

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-02-07

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 summary: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-02-07/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-02-07-16.31.html full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-02-07/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-02-07-16.31.log.html ===

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Workstation questions

On 02/07/2018 11:49 AM, Elad Alfassa wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Dusty Mabe <mailto:du...@dustymabe.com>> wrote: > You can add a yum repo file into /etc/yum.repos.d/ and install software > via `rpm-ostree install pkg.name.rpm`, which will pu

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Workstation questions

Note: I copied this email to the atomic-devel@projectatomic.io list. The ato...@lists.fedoraproject.org is mainly meant for automated emails. On 02/07/2018 09:27 AM, Elad Alfassa wrote: > Hi all, Hi Elad! > > I have some questions regarding Fedora Atomic Workstation: > > 1) How do 3rd party

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/01/2018 06:51 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 27.72 > Commit(x86_64): > 39848372585a65dc63fb3052f997139b8b30d6b55ce378337db3664177489d28 > Commit(aarc

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-01-31

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 summary: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-01-31/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-01-31-16.30.html full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-01-31/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-01-31-16.30.log.html

[atomic-devel] No Atomic Working Group meeting today

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 We will not host a meeting today since a lot of people are traveling for devconf. See everyone next week! Dusty -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEPb6zG5c6sV89tRYPMwLb1zlS5nEFAlpoeXMACgkQMwLb1zlS 5nGKzA//QCpGzJqjNmGyrpI4XLrMjkQ8D2IsM

Re: [atomic-devel] [atomic-announce] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/18/2018 02:17 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 27.61 > Commit(x86_64): > 772ab185b0752b0d6bc8b2096d08955660d80ed95579e13e136e6a54e3559ca9 > Commit(aarc

Re: [atomic-devel] Systemd Flanneld Exit 0

On 01/16/2018 03:01 PM, hskarlupka wrote: > All, Hey Heath, > > I'm running a 4 node CentOS 7 Atomic Kubernetes Cluster.  I ran into an > issue over the weekend where two of my nodes stopped running flanneld.  > "Systemctl status flanneld" showed that the processes had an exit status > of 0

[atomic-devel] 2wk atomic release candidate: 20180117

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Tomorrow we will attempt to release the 20180117 images. These images contain the following ostree version/commits from the Fedora-27-updates-20180117.0 updates run: Version: 27.61 Commit(x86_64): 772ab185b0752b0d6bc8b2096d08955660d80ed95579e13e13

  1   2   3   4   5   >