You can get the oc client binaries in the scratch/dynamic setup, right?
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 09:40 AM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
>> if "oc cluster up" doesn't work on atomic we have problems.
>>
>
> It only works if openshift is installed, which it isn'
On 06/16/2016 09:40 AM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
> if "oc cluster up" doesn't work on atomic we have problems.
>
It only works if openshift is installed, which it isn't by default. And
fully containerized openshift on Fedora Atomic Host is still somewhat of
a work in progress (which I'm working on
if "oc cluster up" doesn't work on atomic we have problems.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 09:24 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
>> Josh,
>>
>> We have a lot of videos we created for our last two sprints. If you
>> want some videos to play somewhere, then Ranjith might
On 06/16/2016 09:24 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
> Josh,
>
> We have a lot of videos we created for our last two sprints. If you
> want some videos to play somewhere, then Ranjith might be able to work
> with you to pick out ones that have made it to the released OpenJDK,
> .NET CDK and devstudio/devsuite
Folks,
So I still don't have anything approaching a full schedule of live
demos. I know a lot of you are putting together video demos ... it's
completely OK to demo the same thing in the live demo area.
Let me know.
--
--
Josh Berkus
Project Atomic
Red Hat OSAS
My primary concern is mind-share and "precedent eventually leads to
practice". If all the images and examples presented say :
' FROM: alpine '
We've lost the hearts and minds of developers, and we are no longer a part
of the conversation.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Derek Carr wrote:
> I
Linking this here since I'm sure a lot of the audience will be interested[1]:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/cl...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/7MZJQ3SL6ATVXV3FEPGCMPWYPU4MBT4F/
[1] too many lists
Based on feedback that Atomic Registry was overly complex to configure and
maintain, I have provided a simplified systemd-based deployment method[1].
Install/config docs[2] will be updated ASAP to reflect this. Until then the
source README should be sufficient to get you going.
Feedback encourage
Stef Walter writes:
> About pyudev ... I would suggest that functionality we're starting to
> use it for (such as monitoring for storage devices, and listing their
> properties) should go into the 'atomic storage' subcommand. If it needs
> python-pyudev to make that work, then it makes sense to i
On 16.06.2016 10:37, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if I understand things right, adding storaged as a dependency to
> cockpit-docker is not acceptable. Can I add python-pyudev instead?
>
> Incidentall, what about NetworkManager-team?
So long term, the goal for Cockpit should be to run more in
Hi,
if I understand things right, adding storaged as a dependency to
cockpit-docker is not acceptable. Can I add python-pyudev instead?
Incidentall, what about NetworkManager-team?
11 matches
Mail list logo
