Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] wifi: ath10k: add support for QCA9379 hw1.0 SDIO

2025-02-11 Thread Felix Kaechele
On February 11, 2025 7:57:25 p.m. GMT+01:00, Jeff Johnson wrote: > >Now that Kalle has stepped down, I've inherited this series. > Thanks for picking this up! >I have one question: what firmware & board file does this use? > It uses a firmware and board file that I extracted from the origin

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] wifi: ath10k: add support for QCA9379 hw1.0 SDIO

2025-02-11 Thread Jeff Johnson
On 11/5/2024 8:21 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > On 11/5/2024 7:39 AM, Felix Kaechele wrote: >> Gentle ping on this one. >> >> It still applies cleanly against the ath/master branch as of today. >> >> If there's no chance of this going in please let me know and I'll stop >> re-sending this patch. >> >>

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] wifi: ath10k: add support for QCA9379 hw1.0 SDIO

2024-11-05 Thread Tomas Paukrt
I would like to support the adoption of changes like this one, as they essentially cannot break support for other devices. I submitted simple and non-conflicting patches that added QCA9377-7 support few months ago, but they were also deferred. Best regards Tomas

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] wifi: ath10k: add support for QCA9379 hw1.0 SDIO

2024-11-05 Thread Jeff Johnson
On 11/5/2024 7:39 AM, Felix Kaechele wrote: > Gentle ping on this one. > > It still applies cleanly against the ath/master branch as of today. > > If there's no chance of this going in please let me know and I'll stop > re-sending this patch. > > I understand that bandwidth for ath10k related r

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] wifi: ath10k: add support for QCA9379 hw1.0 SDIO

2024-11-05 Thread Felix Kaechele
Gentle ping on this one. It still applies cleanly against the ath/master branch as of today. If there's no chance of this going in please let me know and I'll stop re-sending this patch. I understand that bandwidth for ath10k related requests is minimal these days and there may not be an int