On 16 May 2016 at 19:04, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>> On 16 May 2016 at 01:34, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>>> On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Roman Yeryomin
wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 21:43, Roma
On 16.05.2016 16:54, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 05/16/2016 07:41 AM, Dirk Neukirchen wrote:
>> HW: Sitecom WLR-8100
>>
>> Trying to fix some issues that popped up recently on that device-
>> in 55-ath10k in modules.d i have the lines
>>
>> ath10k_core debug_mask=0x0020
>> ath10k_pci
>>
>> to enable
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 16 May 2016 at 01:34, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>> On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Roman Yeryomin
>>> wrote:
On 6 May 2016 at 21:43, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 15:47, J
On 05/16/2016 07:41 AM, Dirk Neukirchen wrote:
HW: Sitecom WLR-8100
Trying to fix some issues that popped up recently on that device-
in 55-ath10k in modules.d i have the lines
ath10k_core debug_mask=0x0020
ath10k_pci
to enable debug msg during firmware loading
A recent trunk of LEDE w. 4
HW: Sitecom WLR-8100
Trying to fix some issues that popped up recently on that device-
in 55-ath10k in modules.d i have the lines
ath10k_core debug_mask=0x0020
ath10k_pci
to enable debug msg during firmware loading
A recent trunk of LEDE w. 4.4.10 bootlog snippet is:
[ 11.287977] procd:
On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 11:14 +0300, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> So, very close to "as before": 900Mbps UDP, 750 TCP.
> But still, I was expecting performance improvements from latest ath10k
> code, not regressions.
> I know that hw is capable of 800Mbps TCP, which I'm targeting.
One flow can reach 800
you're right. my fault
Am 16.05.2016 um 09:31 schrieb Michal Kazior:
On 16 May 2016 at 09:08, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
Am 16.05.2016 um 07:35 schrieb Michal Kazior:
On 14 May 2016 at 06:37, Sebastian Gottschall
wrote:
Hello
a long time ago i discovered that ath10k doesnt seem to suppor
On 16 May 2016 at 12:18, Sridhar Kondabathini wrote:
> Hi,
> When we are trying to bring up Hostapd on t1024-frescale board with
> kernel-3.12;
> ath10k drivers backported from 4.4;hostapd 2.5 for 11AC support is used.
> Radio card is
> used is atheros-wle900vx.
>
> Then our access point is no
Hi David,
On May 16, 2016 10:46:25 AM GMT+02:00, David Lang wrote:
>On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>
>> On 16 May 2016 at 11:12, David Lang wrote:
>>> On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>>>
On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:5
Hi,
When we are trying to bring up Hostapd on t1024-frescale board with
kernel-3.12;
ath10k drivers backported from 4.4;hostapd 2.5 for 11AC support is used. Radio
card is
used is atheros-wle900vx.
Then our access point is not coming up, throwing below error.
-
On 13 May 2016 at 17:23, Guenther Kelleter wrote:
[...]
> If I remove the following 2 lines from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c,
> set_key succeeds!
>
> if (!test_bit(ATH10K_FLAG_RAW_MODE, &ar->dev_flags))
> ieee80211_hw_set(ar->hw, SW_CRYPTO_CONTROL);
I think this
On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 16 May 2016 at 11:12, David Lang wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Roman Yeryomin
wrote:
On 6 May 2016 at 21:43, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 6 May 201
On 16 May 2016 at 11:12, David Lang wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>
>> On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Roman Yeryomin
>>> wrote:
On 6 May 2016 at 21:43, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>
> On 6 May 2016 at 15:47, Je
On 16 May 2016 at 01:34, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht wrote:
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Roman Yeryomin
>> wrote:
>>> On 6 May 2016 at 21:43, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 6 May 2016 at 15:47, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> I've created a OpenWR
On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 6 May 2016 at 21:43, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 6 May 2016 at 15:47, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
That is too low a limit, also, for normal use
On 16 May 2016 at 09:08, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
> Am 16.05.2016 um 07:35 schrieb Michal Kazior:
>
> On 14 May 2016 at 06:37, Sebastian Gottschall
> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> a long time ago i discovered that ath10k doesnt seem to support lower
> extension channel configuration which raises also a
16 matches
Mail list logo
