[asterisk-ss7] Asterisk with SS7 via Wanpipe, Dahdi and libss7 – with ISUP SAM support

2012-01-12 Thread Barry O'Donovan
] Thanks, Barry [1] http://www.barryodonovan.com/index.php/2012/01/12/asterisk-ss7-sam-support - -- Kind regards, Barry O'Donovan http://www.opensolutions.ie/ We're IPv6 Ready. Are you? http://www.ipv6ready.ie/ Open Source Solutions Ltd Lynx House, Old Church Road, Lower Kil

Re: [asterisk-ss7] networkindicator

2008-04-22 Thread Barry O'Donovan
On Tuesday 22 April 2008 18:53:09 Joseph wrote: > > Is it possible to dynamically change the networkindicator to > > international or national? > > If yes, what is the command to be used in the dialplan? > > Not that I know of. > > You can add that via code though if you need it :) This appears to

[asterisk-ss7] Sangoma A108 and libss7/chan_ss7 issues

2008-04-23 Thread Barry O'Donovan
Hi folks, I'm trying to use either libss7 (preferably) or chan_ss7 with a Sangoma A108 card but I have issues with both. To summarise, the issue appears to be that the port will not enter a "CONNECTED" state but rather stays in a "Connecting" state and so I cannot pass frames on it. At least t

Re: [asterisk-ss7] Sangoma A108 and libss7/chan_ss7 issues

2008-04-23 Thread Barry O'Donovan
Joseph, Thanks for the reply. Answers below. On Wednesday 23 April 2008 20:57:12 Joseph wrote: > Could you post the settings you used with libss7? switchtype=dms100 signalling = ss7 ss7type = itu ;ss7_called_nai=national ;ss7_calling_nai=national linkset = 1 context=ss7-test group=1 pridialpl

Re: [asterisk-ss7] Sangoma A108 and libss7/chan_ss7 issues

2008-04-23 Thread Barry O'Donovan
Hi Paul, On Wednesday 23 April 2008 20:57:40 Paul Timmins wrote: > Your T1 is in red alarm and doesn't have frame alignment. That's usually > a problem for establishing SS7. :) Any pointers on getting it into alignment? These same wanpipe settings (with a DCHAN) worked perfectly as a PRI inter

Re: [asterisk-ss7] Sangoma A108 and libss7/chan_ss7 issues

2008-04-24 Thread Barry O'Donovan
- they does bother. Trying > cancelling an echo on sigchannel. dig mailing list for > sangoma settings to deal with this. > > On Thursday 24 April 2008 00:36, Barry O'Donovan wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I'm trying to use either libss7 (preferably) or chan_ss7

Re: [asterisk-ss7] Sangoma A108 and libss7/chan_ss7 issues

2008-04-24 Thread Barry O'Donovan
Folks, I think I may have resolved my own issue but I cannot test until tomorrow: On Thursday 24 April 2008 20:09:19 Barry O'Donovan wrote: > span=1,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 ^ I.e. I have the timing source set to 0 ("the port will never be used as a source of timing. This i

Re: [asterisk-ss7] Sangoma A108 and libss7/chan_ss7 issues

2008-04-26 Thread Barry O'Donovan
> bchan is your bearer channels or you voice. > dchan is the data/ss7 channel. That's actually the config for chan_ss7 so no dchan needs to be configured here. I've actually got it working, will post configs next. -- Kind regards, Barry O'Donovan _

Re: [asterisk-ss7] Sangoma A108 and libss7/chan_ss7 issues

2008-04-26 Thread Barry O'Donovan
Folks, Thanks for your help. I've now got it working. It was a combination of a number of thinks including CRC4 on when it needed to be off as well as incorrectly configuring the timing source. The following config files follow for reference for others: * /etc/zaptel.conf * /etc/wanpipe/wa

Re: [asterisk-ss7] libss7+sangoma problem

2008-06-13 Thread Barry O'Donovan
On Friday 13 June 2008 17:24:06 Shaon wrote: > zaptel.conf > > #Sangoma A108 port 1 [slot:13 bus:9 span:1] > span=1,0,0,ccs,hdb3 > bchan=2-15,17-31 > dchan=1 Why are you leaving out chan 16??? Presumably it's a normal bearer channel? span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3 bchan=2-31 dchan=16

[asterisk-ss7] libss7 and IAM/ACM

2008-06-17 Thread Barry O'Donovan
es to the code to correct this? c) and/or any other advice? Thanks a million, Barry O'Donovan [Jun 17 17:11:33] VERBOSE[24300] logger.c: Len = 50 [ 8d 8a 2f 85 01 00 6c fe 3f 00 01 00 20 01 0a 00 02 0a 08 83 90 70 66 10 06 70 0f 0a 07 03 10 70 66 10 06 00 31 02 00 00 39 02 31 c0 1d 03 8

Re: [asterisk-ss7] libss7 and IAM/ACM

2008-06-18 Thread Barry O'Donovan
Hi Kristian and thanks for the detailed replay. Comments follow below: On Wednesday 18 June 2008 08:38:11 Kristian Nielsen wrote: > Why do you prefer libss7 over chan_ss7? You summed it up quite well. In my case I like the fact that it's the same interface as ISDN/PRI via Zap (especially as

Re: [asterisk-ss7] libss7 and IAM/ACM

2008-06-20 Thread Barry O'Donovan
; > > otherwise chan_ss7 will not pass on the first received indication. > > Thanks. Yes, it seems some more work is needed for this, probably any > initial indication should be encoded as parameters in the ACM when > possible, and sent as separate CPG when not.