I've seen this before too.
I have a couple of Asterisk boxes hanging off a switch using SIP. I also used
to explicitly Answer() as the call came in from the switch. My guess is our
switch converts SIP signaling straight to SS7, because anytime a call came in
from a specific in-state AT&T tand
IMHO, and in the sake of a reliable and configurable SS7 stack, I think the
user should know the protocol (at least basically) to understand which is
denied of allowed in the protocol. This bring to my memory the issues with NAI
in PRI... the people set NAI as Unknown, because they don't even kn
Thanks for the answer!
Should the asterisk user be aware of each protocol intricacies? Shouldn't
it be the channel task to send the needed messages? Conversely, should
the user be able to make asterisk to do things not allowed by the
protocols?
Saludos!
H
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 11:18:56PM +
Is not legal to send an ANM without ACM. You can send a CON instead of ANM.
Try to put a Proceeding() in the dial plan.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-Original Message-
From: Horacio J. Peña
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 20:03:43
To:
Subject: [asterisk-ss7] ANM without ACM
Hola!
I'm playing w
