Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 11:20 AM
To: asterisk-ss7@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-ss7] why ss7
use ss7 controlled trunks to the PSTN when PRI no longer makes sense
for technical, policy, or economic reasons
when using F link SS7 linksets to control IMT, they function very
similar
From: asterisk-ss7-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-ss7-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mueller
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 11:20 AM
To: asterisk-ss7@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-ss7] why ss7
use ss7 controlled trunks to the PSTN when PRI no longer makes sense
fo
use ss7 controlled trunks to the PSTN when PRI no longer makes sense
for technical, policy, or economic reasons
when using F link SS7 linksets to control IMT, they function very
similar to PRI trunks; when using A link linksets connected to STP,
then you can have a single linkset or combined links
Hey list,
I want to learn more about asterisk + ss7.
However, I am not at the stage of configuration, compiling or building asterisk
with ss7 yet.
I am more interested in why to use asterisk with ss7 support and how it is
used, if you follow the distinction.
I currently have a mul
Well, I received a clear message from digium about G729, no support for
trunk or pre-releases of asterisk...
Even if I have paid licences.
Wait and see, I'll have soon E1 cards with hardware echo canccellation,
hope it will helps :)
Thx for all anyway,
Olivier
Matthew Fredrickson a écrit :
>
olivier taylor wrote:
> what do you mean by a better software echo canceller?
> I use the standard one in dahdi, wich is better?
> Oslec doesn't seems available for dahdi.
OSLEC was what I was thinking of... although whether or not there is a
patch for DAHDI to use OSLEC I do not know.
> In fact
what do you mean by a better software echo canceller?
I use the standard one in dahdi, wich is better?
Oslec doesn't seems available for dahdi.
In fact the problem came when I needed G729, not supported and not
available by Digium for trunk and 1.6
I tried to install the last version of asterisk,
olivier taylor wrote:
> echocancel is set, the exact message is :
Ok, this means that you either need to try to use a different/better
software echo canceller or you need to get a hardware echo canceller
that will perform better. Thanks for checking that, we just had a
problem a while ago wher
echocancel is set, the exact message is :
uu212-190-xx-xxx*CLI> dahdi show channel 2
Channel: 267-183*CLI>
File Descriptor: 22
Span: 1
Extension: 7-183*CLI>
Dialing: no
Context: default
Caller ID:
Calling TON: 0
Caller ID name:
Mailbox: none
Destroy: 0
InAlarm: 0
Signalling Type: SS7
Radio: 00-67-
olivier taylor wrote:
>
>
> Matthew Fredrickson a écrit :Well, I am quite happy with libss7, no real
> reasons to change for me.
> But, I can't be sure and this is another problem, since I use
> chan_dadhi, I have big echo problems, it wans't the case with zaptel.
> I am buying E1 cards with ha
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:09:56AM -0500, Matthew Fredrickson wrote:
[snip]
> If there is enough interest in getting support for libss7 (i.e. people
> would be willing to buy copies of it to use with libss7) I can look into
> what it would take to get it in.
Maybe the open source version of lib
Matthew Fredrickson a écrit :Well, I am quite happy with libss7, no
real reasons to change for me.
But, I can't be sure and this is another problem, since I use
chan_dadhi, I have big echo problems, it wans't the case with zaptel.
I am buying E1 cards with hardware echo canceller to avoid thi
Krzysztof Drewicz wrote:
> Oakland, Alan napisał(a):
>> To further clarify, libss7 is developed by Digium, where chan_ss7 is
>> developed by a company called Dicea, more information on chan_ss7 can be
>> found on it's voip-info page
>> http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+ss7+channels
>>
Oakland, Alan napisał(a):
> To further clarify, libss7 is developed by Digium, where chan_ss7 is
> developed by a company called Dicea, more information on chan_ss7 can be
> found on it's voip-info page
> http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+ss7+channels
>
Also:
chan_ss7 by Dicea has a c
Zaptel needed to be patched to use Oslec, I must suppose it's the same
for Dahdi.
Olivier
Anton a écrit :
Use OSLEC - others just sux in comparision to OSLEC.
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 15:08, olivier taylor wrote:
Ok,
another question.
They are many possibilities for echo
Use OSLEC - others just sux in comparision to OSLEC.
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 15:08, olivier taylor wrote:
> Ok,
>
> another question.
> They are many possibilities for echo canceller (jpah,
> kb1, mg2, sec2, and sec)
>
> Wich is the best, more efficient?
> Is it also possible to use Oslec
for both T1's and E1's.
>>
>> Chan_ss7 is only for E1's so far.
>>
>> -Mark
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>>> olivier taylor
>>
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jenks, Mark
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 6:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; asterisk-ss7@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-ss7] why
>From what I've seen, libss7 is for both T1's and E1's.
Chan_ss7 is only for E1's so far.
-Ma
27;s and E1's.
Chan_ss7 is only for E1's so far.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
olivier taylor
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 3:13 PM
To: asterisk-ss7@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-ss7] why
Just a q
PM
> To: asterisk-ss7@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [asterisk-ss7] why
>
> Just a question
>
> Why libss7 and chan_SS7
>
> where is the difference and why 2 different accesses to SS7?
>
> Olivier
>
> ps:For myself, I use
Just a question
Why libss7 and chan_SS7
where is the difference and why 2 different accesses to SS7?
Olivier
ps:For myself, I use libss7 and I am happy with it(incoming and
outgoing, thousands of calls).
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by ht
21 matches
Mail list logo
