waw, svn access is really great, thanks Domjan!
On Saturday 22 November 2008 00:45, Domjan Attila wrote:
> so they are there:
> svn co http://87.242.0.27/repos/trunk/chan_dahdi/
> svn co http://87.242.0.27/repos/trunk/libss7/
>
> todo:
> - make ss7linktest work again
> - documentation of the new f
so they are there:
svn co http://87.242.0.27/repos/trunk/chan_dahdi/
svn co http://87.242.0.27/repos/trunk/libss7/
todo:
- make ss7linktest work again
- documentation of the new features
- more tests with STP(s)
- ANSI: testing, implementing some ansi isup timers, moving some isup
messages into th
Domjan Attila wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks, today I have an interconnection (Lucent switch) and seems
> everything ok, only need implement generic notification indication in
> CPG (the switch use it instead of SUS/RES), I fixed the mtp3 restart
> missimplementation. We will have another interconnection, t
Hi,
thanks, today I have an interconnection (Lucent switch) and seems
everything ok, only need implement generic notification indication in
CPG (the switch use it instead of SUS/RES), I fixed the mtp3 restart
missimplementation. We will have another interconnection, the another
telco has STPs the c
Hey Domjan,
Your patches great, I'm already using them on one of my live
servers. I've noticed one issue with them in the tests, but
it's not too critical.
Regards,
Anton.
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 01:32, Domjan Attila wrote:
> Hi,
> I hope tomorrow will be fixed my leased lines and this
> w
Matthew Fredrickson schrieb:
>
> Besides getting everything ready so that we pass all interconnection
> tests, it is the next highest priority.
>
Wow, this sounds great.
good luck to you all and keep up the good work. it awesome ;)
tobias
___
--Ban
Hi,
I hope tomorrow will be fixed my leased lines and this week we will
finish the interconnection tests and you can inspect my patches.
Rgards,
Attila
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 11:02 -0600, Matthew Fredrickson wrote:
> Tobias Wolf wrote:
> > Matthew Fredrickson schrieb:
> >> Kristian Nielsen wrote:
Tobias Wolf wrote:
> Matthew Fredrickson schrieb:
>> Kristian Nielsen wrote:
>>> Tobias Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> I believe you can do this with chan_ss7, setting up two boxes as a
>>> cluster, though I think you would set up both boxes with the same point
>>> code. This is important
Matthew Fredrickson schrieb:
> Kristian Nielsen wrote:
>> Tobias Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> I believe you can do this with chan_ss7, setting up two boxes as a
>> cluster, though I think you would set up both boxes with the same point
>> code. This is important not only to get load shari
Kristian Nielsen wrote:
> Tobias Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I believe you can do this with chan_ss7, setting up two boxes as a
> cluster, though I think you would set up both boxes with the same point
> code. This is important not only to get load sharing but also to be able to do
> syst
Tobias Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I believe you can do this with chan_ss7, setting up two boxes as a
cluster, though I think you would set up both boxes with the same point
code. This is important not only to get load sharing but also to be able to do
system maintenance without downtime, and
Hi,
is the following setup possible ?
Two Asterisk Boxes, every Box has its own Point Code, both are connected
to the same SS7 Switch. Now i want incoming call from the SS7 Switch
load shared over my two Asterisk Machines. So first call goes to Server
A and the second Call goes to Server B.
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
