10-124
> rxgain=0
> txgain=0
>
> group=3
> signalling=pri_net
> context=PBX3_Asterisk
> channel=>32-46,48-62
> rxgain=0
> txgain=0
>
> ;GROUP4 : USED FOR SS7
> group=4
> ;signalling=pri_net
> signalling=ss7
> context=PBX1_Asterisk
> channel=>
share your chan_dahdi.conf
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:51 PM, amine wrote:
> @Goke M Aruna
>
> */etc/dahdi/system.conf*
>
> *Machine1:* I tryed with mtp2, bchan, dchan
>
> span=1,0,0,ccs,hdb3
>
> bchan=1-15,17-31
>
> #mtp2=16
>
> #bchan=16
>
> dch
Can you post your config files?
in the system.conf
bchan=1-15,17-31
dchan=16
Regards
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:44 PM, amine wrote:
> @Goke M Aruna : The used cable is a pri crossed cable.
>
> Telephony card : OpenVox PRI x 4Ports
>
>
> On 03/18/2013 12:36 PM, Goke M Ar
Are you using a straight cable or cross cable?
Regards
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:18 PM, amine wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> @Matthias van der Vlies : Thanks a lot for the information, indeed that
> was the solution for my first problem.
>
> Now I have a Link with the state INSERVICE in both machines.
You can also use Sangoma A104d cards.
I have purchased and used both digium and Sangoma cards.
Thank you.
On 11/9/11, bipin singh wrote:
> Hi,
> If you are new for asterisk then use only digium card . All
> digium pri (1 port , 2 port or 4 port ) card work with ss7 link . If you
> re
hello all,
it is an africa company and the best for him is to locate his network in a
place where all the telcos have their switching centers. they always locate
it close to each other because of the backbone connectivity limitation
especially in nigeria,
Thanks
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 6:42 AM,
what version of dahdi, chan_ss7, sangoma version, asterisk are you running.
Thanks
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jakub Klausa wrote:
>
> On 2010-08-12, at 15:46, equis software wrote:
>
> > Hi, I'm trying to connect an asterisk with chan_ss7 to an SIEMENS EWSD
> > I make calls ok, but in my
Received this message from Aruna 20 times, is it just for me or everyone?
>>
>> Mitul Limbani
>>
>> Goke M Aruna wrote:
>>
>>>Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
>>>different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset o
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
Both libss7 and chan_ss7 can handle multiple signalling in a box for
different linkset, however, for splitting a linkset over two servers,
its only chan_ss7 that can handle that.
Hope I am correct.
On 7/31/10, Nitesh Divecha wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs... much appreciate.
>
PM, Amish wrote:
> Dear Goke,
>
>
> Where in the trace do the links fail?
> I see that at packet 954 and and 956 you receive a TFP, for point code
> 1538.
>
> A.
>
>
>
> On 04/18/2010 10:01 PM, Goke M Aruna wrote:
>
> Dear Amish,
>
> my ss7.c
all to certain 78 simultaneous calls and the
> signalling just failed and the dump is as attached.
> I tried disabling the sltm, asterisk refuse to start giving me the error
> "unknown options".
>
> kindly help.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Goke M Aruna wr
ption".
kindly help.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Goke M Aruna wrote:
> Amish,
>
> Thanks everybody for your response so far.
>
> however, after loading the call to certain 78 simultaneous calls and the
> signalling just failed and the dump is as attached.
> I tried disa
Log messages.
On 4/14/10, Amish wrote:
> On 04/14/2010 02:32 AM, Goke M Aruna wrote:
>> Thanks Amish,
>>
>> the links have been up for the last 4 hours with minor error util.c :
>> failed to delete timer.
>>
> Hi,
>
> Where this this error appear? The
Thanks Amish,
the links have been up for the last 4 hours with minor error util.c : failed
to delete timer.
Thanks
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-ss7 mailing list
To UNSUBSCR
hi all,
Can you please help me out? I tried setting up asterisk-1.6.2.6 +
wanpipe-3.5.10 dahdi-2.2.1.1 and chan_ss7-1.3.
i got the signalling up but its lost the signalling to t7 timeout after a
while and i have to restart wanrouter and asterisk to get the signaling
INSERVICE again.
i have done
s7.conf, I am
getting unknown config.
kindly help.
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Domjan Attila wrote:
> zaptel won't come up anymore, just dahdi :)
>
> A108 + HWEC
> dahdi-linux-2.2.1
> wanpipe 3.4.8
> mtp2 channel mode, libss7
>
> On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 17:23
Can you tell me what version of wanpipe do you use?
Am having error Zaptel device failed to come up.
Possible cause Udev not installed.
Can someone help. I have confimed I have udev
On 3/15/10, Ngo-Vi Hoai-Anh wrote:
> We have managed to make it work with DAHDI_CHUNKSIZE 40.
>
> We use:
> - Sa
es not
> support the requested chunk size.
>
> On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 13:52 +0100, Goke M Aruna wrote:
> > there is need to change the line 60 of /usr/src/dahdi-linux-2.2.1.1/
> > drivers/dahdi/wcb4xxp/base.c to DAHDI_DEFAULT_CHUNKSIZE from
> > DAHDI_CHUNKSIZE.
> >
>
there is need to change the line 60 of /usr/src/dahdi-linux-2.2.1.1/
drivers/dahdi/wcb4xxp/base.c to DAHDI_DEFAULT_CHUNKSIZE from
DAHDI_CHUNKSIZE.
and same apply to line 2356 of
/usr/src/dahdi-linux-2.2.1.1/drivers/dahdi/wct4xxp/base.c
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Goke M Aruna wrote
hello Marek,
after applying the patch to dahdi-linux-2.2.1.1
when i run make i got this error.
usr/src/dahdi-linux-2.2.1.1/drivers/dahdi/wcb4xxp/base.c:60:2: error: #error
Sorry, wcb4xxp does not support chunksize != 8
make[3]: *** [/usr/src/dahdi-linux-2.2.1.1/drivers/dahdi/wcb4xxp/base.o]
Err
contact a...@netfors.com
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Robert Verspuy wrote:
> All,
>
> Here in the Netherlands we have a SS7 connection with the biggest local
> telco.
> This local telco has 2 redundant networks, and uses different point
> codes for signaling and the audio streams.
>
> we
Peter,
Prefix + is an indicator.
Thanks
On 2/24/10, peterpet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a way to know from where is incomming call - national or
> international?
>
>
> --
> _
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://
I will advise you put a physical loop-back cable on the port and confirm
your configuration is okay and later work with your provider.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Peter Petrov wrote:
> hi, check the physical transport layer. Check the cable, and if you have
> optical E1 modems check the
check your ss7.conf file.
the first machine signalling channel config is not right. check the sample
configuration file.
check ss7.conf.template.two-hosts.
Thanks
2009/12/29 Yoherman
> Hi all,
>
> i want to make SS7 failover with two asterisk boxes, each 4 port digium
> card.
> schannel at F
Anwar,
Use chan_ss7. It will be easier from my own opinion.
Goksie
On 12/19/09, anwarul mamun wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I want to configure a voip gateway using asterisk and digium E1 card. The
> inbound call is through internet and those call will be terminated using E1
> through ss7 link.
>
use single OPC and do clustering with other servers.
Thanks
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:12 AM, lizhong zhu wrote:
> hello, users:
> I want to implement a scenario in this way: there are 10 servers with 10
> PRI cards(4 port pri), but telcom provider only gives
> 4 OPCs and 1 DPC. how do i set the
=> xxx:222
> links => L1:1,L2:2
>
> extensions.conf
> ---
> [ss7]
> exten => _188.,1,Dial(SS7/${EXTEN:3})
> exten => _188.,n,Hangup()
> I want to dedicated L1 to 188 & L2 to another customer who will send calls
> with 288 prefix. Any exa
for chan_ss7,
the dial plan always follow the linkset from what was written in the readme
file
exten => _234.,1,Dial(ss7/linkset/${EXTEN})
but you can try this
exten => _234.,2,Dial(ss7/linkset:cic 1-15/${EXTEN})
Thanks
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Mohammad Salaque wrote:
> all you need t
With a single dchan?
On 10/11/09, Sumon Ahmed wrote:
> Dear Sir,
> is there any way to configure chan_ss7 to dedicated E1 with specific prefix.
> like,
>
> 188 prefix will use 1st E1
> 288 prefix will use 2nd E1
> 388 prefix will use 3rd E1
> 488 prefix will use 4th E1
>
> I'll be grateful if a
any link to download this new version.
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Any MGCP or MEGACO/H.248 news?
>
> --
> Sent from mobile device
>
> On May 19, 2009, at 1:23 PM, "Jorge F. Churio "
> wrote:
>
> > Redfone and Dicea had announced yesterday they released a new and
> >
On 12/3/07, Anton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try to switch off the hardware echo canceler
> TDMV_HWEC = YES
>
> On Monday 03 December 2007, Goke Aruna wrote:
> > I have used asterisk-1.4.14, zaptel-1.4.7, chan_ss7-1.0.0
> > on FC7 all went okay. using sangoma a104dx on both
> > machine.
> >
59 matches
Mail list logo
