Re: [asterisk-ss7] RES: Most stable SS7 Implementation WAS: facing problem with libss7

2011-03-17 Thread Krzysztof Drewicz
2011/3/17 Rafael Prado Rocchi : > Hi, > Have you tried Attila's Version? > https://observer.router.hu/repos_pub/libss7/trunk/ > > We are using it in production in some companies. > But we implemented all SS7 stuff in asterisk 1.4 thanks, my requirment 'grow up' from asterisk (or any other softswi

[asterisk-ss7] RES: Most stable SS7 Implementation WAS: facing problem with libss7

2011-03-17 Thread Rafael Prado Rocchi
Hi, Have you tried Attila's Version? https://observer.router.hu/repos_pub/libss7/trunk/ We are using it in production in some companies. But we implemented all SS7 stuff in asterisk 1.4 Asterisk 1.4 Digium Boards Dahdi ItÂ’s super stable and working fine with no errors for more than 6 months no

Re: [asterisk-ss7] Most stable SS7 Implementation WAS: facing problem with libss7

2011-03-17 Thread Krzysztof Drewicz
2011/3/17 Jeremy Parr : > > On that note, which flavour of SS7 driver provides the best support and > stability. It appears that Sangoma have their own SS7 implementation, as > does Digium. Well, Sangoma's libss7 does not have HA capability when you want to split: one Signalling Point of your * (

[asterisk-ss7] Most stable SS7 Implementation WAS: facing problem with libss7

2011-03-17 Thread Jeremy Parr
On 14 March 2011 06:10, tanveer khan wrote: > Dear All, > > i am new to libss7 and having many problem. i was able to install different > version of libss7, dahid and asterisk. but when i test it. each contain some > problem i.e > > 1. continuous rbt on ss7 side even i answer the call on sip si