Mehdi Shirazi wrote:
>>> Although I am not using true M3UA and sigtran protocols right now,
>>> conceptually, this is almost exactly what we are doing, except we will
>>> support multiple SGs to each ASP as well.
>
>>> Matthew Fredrickson
>>> Digium, Inc.
>
> For multiple SGs to each ASP support
voip me wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Im not sure if its the best choice but i think it might be a standard
> way to terminate a sig channel in one box and make it talk MGCP to other
> boxes. As far as i could remember Mathew was after adding MGCP to
> chan_zap sometimes before. Whats your opinion gu
>>Although I am not using true M3UA and sigtran protocols right now,
>>conceptually, this is almost exactly what we are doing, except we will
>>support multiple SGs to each ASP as well.
>>Matthew Fredrickson
>>Digium, Inc.
For multiple SGs to each ASP support am I correct :
"with M3UA we need on
Hi folks,
Im not sure if its the best choice but i think it might be a standard way to
terminate a sig channel in one box and make it talk MGCP to other boxes. As
far as i could remember Mathew was after adding MGCP to chan_zap sometimes
before. Whats your opinion guys?
Regards.
--
M. Shokuie Nia
Ruddy Gbaguidi wrote:
> Hi All
> I have to setup an ss7 link with the telco but they are not seeing any
> signal from my side.
>
> Behind the digium card the light is GREEN however. Is there anything I'm
> missing here ?
> Here is are my configuration.
You can also try using the ss7linktest pro
Amish Chana wrote:
> Hi,
>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>
>>> In this case, if the point code is distributed across more than one box,
>>> how do you manage SS7 link (and linkset) failures, where the messages
>>> need to be re-routed via another link (or linkset) during failure scenarios?
>> Well, to have a f
