it can be, except one small trick - the negative
> lookahead (?!\k). So, yes - looking around the string without moving
> the position around makes some things more easy.
>
>
> This thread should be stopped here. This is a test list for development
> versions - it is not a blog and it
moving
the position around makes some things more easy.
This thread should be stopped here. This is a test list for development
versions - it is not a blog and it is not a place to learn perl regular
expressions.
Thomas
Von:"K Post"
An: "ASSP development mailing
oFirst and FROMFirstMatch sections.
Whew.
:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 4:53 AM Thomas Eckardt
wrote:
> forgot to say:
>
> if assp requires to capture the match for a regex, the code would be for
> example
>
> $string =~ /($testReRE)/
> $match = $1;
>
> so - at runtime the
?searchstring1|searchstring2|searchstring3)[^@\r\n]{0,64}\@[^@\r\n]{0,64}\k.?>>>~
Want to know more about regular expressions? ->
http://www.rexegg.com/regex-lookarounds.html
Thomas
Von:"K Post"
An: "ASSP development mailing list"
Datum: 04.11.20
:"Thomas Eckardt"
An: "ASSP development mailing list"
Datum: 04.11.2021 09:22
Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] RegEx Backreferences - the basics
to make backreferences working, regex optimization must be switched off
for the complete regex -> tested -> worked
>I&
and if I read the explanation there, I sure it will not work like you
expect
Thomas
Von:"K Post"
An: "ASSP development mailing list"
Datum: 04.11.2021 02:29
Betreff:[Assp-test] RegEx Backreferences - the basics
I've got nothing in my TestRe file
I've got nothing in my TestRe file except for a single line:
~<<<(?:^|\n\r).*(searchstring).*@.*\1.*>>>~
The idea is to log any time there's a line that includes "searchstring" on
the right and left of an @. This is just a very rudimentary test because
backreferences seem to error for me. I wo
