Now you've taken up the entirety of any free time I would have had this
coming weekend so I fully dissect your (I'm sure vastly) improved regex!
Can't wait to learn from it, especially how you're using the negative
lookahead.
Already I'm learning from it, I didn't know you could do defines at all,
Having the dkimBonusScoreList would be like applying dkimBonusValancePB but
ONLY for those that DKIM validate AND are on the scorelist. Here's why I
think that would be helpful and what you proposed could be
problematic. Essentially:
I'm thinking: "look, this organization usually sends good stuff
Another useless post about concepts without reading the manual.
>dkimBonusValancePB
there is already dkimOkValencePB - increase it
and
reduce the score for certain domains by blackListedDomains, SenderBase or
anywhere else - if needed
Thomas
Von:"K Post"
An: "ASSP development ma
>It seems like using <<< >>> to turn of regex optimization might break the
2nd parameter from being recognized.
That's true. It is fixed in the next release.
regex:
something like this is better to read after some time, it is much less
greedy, faster and selfexplaining:
(?(DEFINE)(?[a-z]{2,6
