Re: beaglebone black - bootfile confusion

2022-11-05 Thread Alec
It runs previous versions of openbsd. Freebsd also, so I doubt it is internal storage fault. But anyway, sorry for hijacking the thread. On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 08:51:14 p.m. GMT+9, Jan Stary wrote: On Nov 04 06:35:01, olp...@yahoo.ca wrote: > I actually could not run anything

Re: beaglebone black - bootfile confusion

2022-11-04 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 13:40:35 +0100 > From: Jan Stary > > On Nov 04 13:14:31, mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote: > > The device names used by the bootloader differ from the names used by > > the kernel. What gets printed as bootdevice/bootfile here is simply > > the string that the bootloader pas

Re: beaglebone black - bootfile confusion

2022-11-04 Thread Jan Stary
On Nov 04 13:14:31, mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote: > The device names used by the bootloader differ from the names used by > the kernel. What gets printed as bootdevice/bootfile here is simply > the string that the bootloader passed to the kernel. We probably > should change the names in the boot

Re: beaglebone black - bootfile confusion

2022-11-04 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 12:59:13 +0100 > From: Jan Stary > > On Nov 02 21:18:03, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > This is current/armv7 on a BeagleBone Black, dmesg below. > > The booting sequence ends with > > > > sd0 at scsibus0 targ 1 lun 0: removable > > sd0: 1832MB, 512 bytes/sector, 3751936 s

Re: beaglebone black - bootfile confusion

2022-11-04 Thread Jan Stary
On Nov 02 21:18:03, h...@stare.cz wrote: > This is current/armv7 on a BeagleBone Black, dmesg below. > The booting sequence ends with > > sd0 at scsibus0 targ 1 lun 0: removable > sd0: 1832MB, 512 bytes/sector, 3751936 sectors > scsibus1 at sdmmc0: 2 targets, initiator 0 > sd1 at scsibus1

Re: beaglebone black - bootfile confusion

2022-11-04 Thread Jan Stary
On Nov 04 06:35:01, olp...@yahoo.ca wrote: > I actually could not run anything after 6.X,  > so had to install freebsd there, unfortunately. > (can't remember the X now).  > It was always failing to install on the internal disk. > (can't write on disk, errors). It is quite possible that the intern

Re: beaglebone black - bootfile confusion

2022-11-04 Thread David Barrass
I am intending to try the 7.2 install on a Beaglebone Black having not had any success to date with any stock images from 5.9 onwards. the issue that I experience is U-Boot. I can boot my BBB from U-Boot images from other projects but when I simply write the image as downloaded from a nearby mirror

Re: beaglebone black - bootfile confusion

2022-11-03 Thread Alec
I actually could not run anything after 6.X,  so had to install freebsd there, unfortunately. (can't remember the X now).  It was always failing to install on the internal disk. (can't write on disk, errors). On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 03:20:44 p.m. GMT+9, Jan Stary wrote: On Nov 03 2

Re: beaglebone black - bootfile confusion

2022-11-03 Thread Jan Stary
On Nov 03 22:14:32, olp...@yahoo.ca wrote: > Wow, did you install vanilla 7.2 on bbb? Is it the 7.2 in particular that surprises you? OpenBSD has been running on bbb since 5.4 for me. > Or did you have to tweak kernel? No, it installs just fine.

Re: beaglebone black - bootfile confusion

2022-11-03 Thread Alec
Wow, did you install vanilla 7.2 on bbb? Or did you have to tweak kernel? On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 05:18:10 a.m. GMT+9, Jan Stary wrote: This is current/armv7 on a BeagleBone Black, dmesg below. The booting sequence ends with   sd0 at scsibus0 targ 1 lun 0: removable   sd0: 1832

beaglebone black - bootfile confusion

2022-11-02 Thread Jan Stary
This is current/armv7 on a BeagleBone Black, dmesg below. The booting sequence ends with sd0 at scsibus0 targ 1 lun 0: removable sd0: 1832MB, 512 bytes/sector, 3751936 sectors scsibus1 at sdmmc0: 2 targets, initiator 0 sd1 at scsibus1 targ 1 lun 0: removable sd1: 30436MB, 512 bytes/sec