On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 09:55:21PM -0700, s_g...@telus.net wrote:
> Thank you for the updates. I will build and test as soon as I get finished
> with the php build. My system is still flailing away at gtk with each ld
> session taking about 20 minutes. Could be days yet.
>
fixed the diff wit
t; com0: console
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-...@openbsd.org On Behalf Of Artturi Alm
> Sent: May 2, 2018 2:26 PM
> To: s_g...@telus.net
> Cc: arm@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: gtk libool slow on arm
>
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:35:27AM -0700, s_g...
s_g...@telus.net
Cc: arm@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: gtk libool slow on arm
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:35:27AM -0700, s_g...@telus.net wrote:
> I realize the orangepi is not the swiftest of machines, but the ld
> issue is more than just SOC performance. The ld process should finish
> within a
, 2018 5:21 PM
To: Stephen Graf
Cc: arm@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: gtk libool slow on arm
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 05:36:33PM -0700, s_g...@telus.net wrote:
> Thank you for the advice. I will try the patch, but I want to let the
> current php build complete, which may take a few more days.
&g
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 05:36:33PM -0700, s_g...@telus.net wrote:
> Thank you for the advice. I will try the patch, but I want to let the
> current php build complete, which may take a few more days.
>
> Did you get the bme code I sent you?
>
Yep, I just forgot about it, and now i did "over do"
aa->fa_node, "snps,dw-apb-uart")) {
+ sc->sc_uarttype = COM_UART_16550A;
+ sc->sc_fifolen = 64;
intr = com_fdt_intr_designware;
+ }
if (OF_is_compatible(faa->fa_node, "ti,omap3-uart") ||
OF_is_compatible(fa
quot;)) {
+ sc->sc_uarttype = COM_UART_16550A;
+ sc->sc_fifolen = 64;
intr = com_fdt_intr_designware;
+ }
if (OF_is_compatible(faa->fa_node, "ti,omap3-uart") ||
OF_is_compatible(faa->fa_node, "ti,omap4-uart&quo
sc->sc.sc_fifolen = 64;
intr = com_fdt_intr_designware;
+ }
if (OF_is_compatible(faa->fa_node, "ti,omap3-uart") ||
OF_is_compatible(faa->fa_node, "ti,omap4-uart"))
>
> -Original Message-
> From: own
On 2018/05/02 10:35, s_g...@telus.net wrote:
> I realize the orangepi is not the swiftest of machines, but the ld issue is
> more than just SOC performance. The ld process should finish within a few
> seconds to a minute. It is taking 20 minutes.
"should"... I have things where ld takes many min
3:10 AM
To: s_g...@telus.net
Cc: po...@openbsd.org; arm@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: gtk libool slow on arm
> From:
> Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 16:30:28 -0700
>
> Why is the gtk libtool so slow on arm? A typical command such as:
It's not libtool, but ld, the link editor that i
> From:
> Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 16:30:28 -0700
>
> Why is the gtk libtool so slow on arm? A typical command such as:
It's not libtool, but ld, the link editor that is taking its time.
> libtool: link: cc -o .libs/testentrycompletion -pthread -O2 -pipe -g -Wall
> -Wl,-rpath-link -Wl,/usr/X11R6/l
11 matches
Mail list logo
