> Linux is documentation...it's just not formal documentation.
I'm sorry, but I can't agree with that.
Having Linux code only tells you how to drive a piece of hardware, the
way Linux does. What if you want to use a particular function Linux
doesn't use? What if Linux does things that way because
On 09/10/11 22:22, Robert Keyes wrote:
...
> Linux is documentation...it's just not formal documentation.
Then we await your port of OpenBSD to this thing, since you know so much
more about this.
(first trick is to get one, of course. I've seen way too much vaporware
that leads off with a wonder
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Robert Keyes wrote:
>
> Linux is documentation...it's just not formal documentation. Regarding the
> hardware price...what do you expect for $25? It's not a bad price.
>
A large part of the functionality resides in a BLOB that is loaded by
the GPU before any OS is
, sungkwan park wrote:
http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/25-pc-alpha-board-successfully-runs-linux-20110824/
Linux is not documentation.
Obviously some compromises needed to be made to get the price down
to this level.
Linux is documentation...it's just not formal documentation. Regardin
n for it.
>
On 2011/09/03 20:14, sungkwan park wrote:
> http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/25-pc-alpha-board-successfully-runs-linux-20110824/
Linux is not documentation.
Obviously some compromises needed to be made to get the price down
to this level.
>From http://elinux.org/RaspberryPiBoar
http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/25-pc-alpha-board-successfully-runs-linux-20110824/
2011/9/3 Tobias Ulmer
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:57:39AM -0400, Ian Darwin wrote:
> >
> http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/why-a-25-pc-because-its-the-price-of-a-tex
> > tbook-2011091/
>
