Good morning!
It was wonderful to see so many of you at ARIN 38 in Dallas!! I truly
appreciate your support and vote in my efforts to join the ARIN Advisory
Council. The polls are open until Friday so there is still plenty of time to
vote!
https://arin.net/participate/elections/index.html
The ARIN Draft Policy 2017-1 shepherds working with the original author have
updated the problem statement and added clarification to section 8.5.5. The AC
would like feedback on the proposed updated problem statement and modification
to 8.5.5. We encourage community members to comment on the p
Thank you for the feedback on this draft policy to date. I would appreciate
any other thoughts or comments on this draft policy.
For review, Draft Policy 2017-6 is intended to add the following conditions on
Inter RIR transfers to section 8.4:
Recipient RIR policy must not permit transfers to
I concur with David’s point of view as a valuable starting point.
I support as written.
Thank you
-Alison
From: ARIN-PPML [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On Behalf Of David Farmer
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 10:18 AM
To: Kevin Blumberg
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml]
Thank you all for the excellent feedback on this draft.
Considering James’ suggestions, would the community prefer to take each point
as a different proposal? They seem to be two different solutions to two
different issues.
Thanks!
-Alison
From: ARIN-PPML [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net]
Good Morning!
Regarding Draft Policy 2018-1, Allow Inter-Regional ASN Transfers, the
shepherds have modified the problem statement as follows:
Problem Statement:
There is a need to allow Inter-RIR transfers of ASNs with RIRs that have an
equivalent transfer policy. The need is driven primarily
ARIN Community:
As we approach the next ARIN meeting, I would like to remind the community of
the proposal to allow inter-regional ASN transfers. I will be presenting this
topic at the meeting and would love to address any comments or questions on
this proposal. Please feel free to email the
Thank you for breaking out the definitions. I support your minor change and
agree that the sentence, “A temporary assignment of address space provided to
third parties shall not be considered a reassignment or a violation of the
exclusive use criterion.” should be added to both Assignment and
Good afternoon!
My name is Alison Wood and I am one of the assigned shepherds to prop 310. The
proposal would like to change the phrase "IP address space" to "Internet
numbering resources" in section 2.1 and "address space" to "numbering
resources" in section 2.2.
I value your opinion. Plea
Good afternoon!
My name is Alison Wood and I am one of the assigned shepherds to prop 314. The
proposal would like to better define what IANA is when mentioned in the NRPM.
Please let me know if you feel this is an editorial change and if you have any
concerns with the verbiage. See the full
Good afternoon PPML:
It has been brought to the attention of the Policy Experience Working Group
that in rare circumstances it is possible that Internet resources re-issued
from revoked RSA space may have been on a block list or currently routed. The
ARIN staff is very careful to make sure th
Good afternoon!
Draft policy 2022-4 pertains to the clean up of NRPM section 2.1 and 2.2.
This policy would clarify and improve the consistency of terminology,
specifically referring to changing "IP address space" to "Internet number
resources" in section 2.1 and in section 2.2, change the text
Hello!
The Policy Experience Report Working Group has been working on the Policy
Experience Report from ARIN 50. I would appreciate your feedback on the
following issue regarding transferring waitlist space.
The current wait list criteria is:
* Must have a /20 or less in total IPv4 holdi
Hi Josh
I appreciate the feedback. At this point we are just gathering thoughts from
the community, but the intent of this would be that this does not apply to M &
A’s.
Thanks!
-Alison
From: Josh Meyers
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 1:49 PM
To: WOOD Alison * DAS
Cc: arin-ppml@arin
Hello!
The Policy Experience Report Working Group has been working on the Policy
Experience Report from ARIN 50. I would appreciate your feedback on the
following issue regarding transferring waitlist space.
The current wait list criteria is:
* Must have a /20 or less in total IPv4 hol
Good morning PPML!
I am the shepherd for draft policy 2022-11, revising section 2.17.
This draft policy deals with the definition of Internet number resources, which
is currently not defined in the NRPM. Our proposed definition is as follows:
"Internet number resources are unique identifiers w
Good morning PPML!
I would like community feedback on the leasing of ip space that is obtained
from the waitlist. Please let me know what you think and if a policy proposal
would be warranted.
Thank you!
-Alison
___
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this
Happy Friday ARIN Community!
The Policy Experience Report from ARIN 52 brought about great discussion on
4.10 space and I would appreciate your feedback.
A growing number of organizations are requesting multiple /24s from the 4.10
reserve pool to provide services in geographically distanced dat
This is perfect, thank you Owen!
From: Owen DeLong
Sent: Saturday, December 9, 2023 9:43 PM
To: WOOD Alison * DAS
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Policy Experience Report 4.10 Space
On Dec 8, 2023, at 09:43, WOOD Alison * DAS wrote:
Happy Friday ARIN Community!
The Policy
Hello ARIN Community!
The time has come to discuss Community Networks. Sections 2.11 and 6.59 of the
NRPM outline the definition of Community Networks and grant them special
permission to obtain a /40 block of IPv6 space. This Community Networks policy
was added in 2008 and to date only one C
Hello Community!!
The Policy Experience Report Working Group (PERWG) would like to get the
community’s input on a potential issue. Currently, IPv4 space allocated via
the 4.1.8 waitlist must meet in-region justification at the time of request.
However, the policy isn’t entirely clear on what
I am in favor of the Advisory Council’s recommendation. The proposed
recommendation is a broad stroke to address fraudulent behavior, but given new
community feedback it could potentially use some refinement after initial
implementation.
I encourage the community to continue submitting their i
Thank you for the continued input on this draft policy proposal.
I will be updating the text of the draft policy to include both 4.4 and 4.10
pools. Point of information, the 4.4 pool currently has approximately 391
/24’s and 4.10 has approximately 15,753 /24’s available and are not estimated
Thank you Scott and Bill for your comments.
This editorial change was part of a much bigger draft policy that came out of
the NRPM cleanup, but many of those edits were pre-empted by various polices
that were implemented prior to the edits being approved.
Sections 8.3 and 8.4 remained after the
Good morning ARIN Community!!
I would love your feedback on ARIN Draft Policy 2023-5, which involves the
clean up of NRPM Sections 4.3, 4.4, 4.10 and 6.10.1.
These are all straightforward and simple changes to the NRPM, including:
Delete section 4.3.4 in its entirety and replace it with the head
25 matches
Mail list logo
