not overlap currently assigned space, and are not from private or
>>> other non-routable Internet Resource space. The allocation size shall be
>>> consistent with the existing ARIN minimum allocation sizes, unless smaller
>>> allocations are intended to be explicitly par
ections 4 or 6, resulting in under-use, perhaps a wider overhaul of the
policy is necessary, rather than an "editorial" change.
-Matt
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 3:25 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 30, 2022, at 14:06, Matt Erculiani wrote:
>
> First post on the PPML, p
e for implementation:
>
>
>
> 1. Removal of section 3.5: Immediate after ARIN Board adoption.
>
> 2. Removal of the ‘OriginAS’ field from the database: 24 months after ARIN
> Board adoption.
>
>
>
> Policy Term: Permanent
> ___
pace vs getting a normal
> assignment which they know they don't need long term, AND more importantly
> they won't be using for actively routing user traffic, I'm not sure why
> this experimental allocation is seen as unnecessary.
>
> Anita
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at
ppens. Are
we willing to take the chance?
-Matt
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022, 18:05 Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 31, 2022, at 15:03, Matt Erculiani wrote:
>
> I fully stand by my comments made in-person. I do not support this policy.
>
> I do not believe making this data har
man/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>
> ___
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
> Unsu
There appears to be a lot more overlap than just that stanza. Does it make
sense to combine 8.3 and 8.4 into just 8.3 "Transfers between specified
recipients" then call out the differences between intra and inter RIR
policy in a new 8.3.1 and 8.3.2?
But to actually answer the question that was ask
>
>
> ___
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/
subscription at:
>> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>
> ___
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the
ist (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
--
Matt Erculiani, NREMT
ERCUL-ARIN
___
ARIN-PPM
nsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>
> ___
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message be
might be best to
put some additional parameters around what justifies that large of an
allocation.
Is /16 the new /8?
-Matt
Matt Erculiani
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 08:17 Fernando Frediani
wrote:
> If in practice no organizations can justify that size of block I don't
> think rest
> your announcement from wherever you are in the world consumes a slot in
their routing tables
The size of the Internet’s routing table isn’t an ARIN problem, nor should
it influence number policy decisions. It’s a vendor and operator problem.
-Matt
Matt Erculiani
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at
of
them are here ;)
-Matt
Matt Erculiani
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 18:09 David Conrad wrote:
> On Aug 14, 2024, at 4:15 PM, Matt Erculiani wrote:
>
> > your announcement from wherever you are in the world consumes a slot in
> their routing tables
> The size of the Internet’s r
ine is lost and those who
continue to justify their needs are moved up until they are fulfilled or
IPv4 becomes obsolete.
-Matt
Matt Erculiani
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 21:29 William Herrin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 4:15 PM Matt Erculiani
> wrote:
> > > your announcement
he ARIN AC, the ASO AC,
> >>> and the ARIN Board of Trustees. Those participating in our
> >>> meetings presently gain broad exposure to all aspects of ARIN
> >>> – not just number resource policy development – and I do
> >>>
tunnel services that
make this a viable option these days.
I’m prepared to be eaten alive for the suggestion.
Matt Erculiani
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 12:30 Tyler O'Meara via ARIN-PPML <
arin-ppml@arin.net> wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I don't think a categorical exclusion for &
17 matches
Mail list logo
