> On 27 Oct 2023, at 18:54, Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML
> wrote:
>
>
> Sure, but there’s no other list open to those interested who are not general
> members.
Including those of us who only have ARIN ASNs but number resources are
elsewhere who cannot be general members despite paying fees.
On 28 Oct 2023 at 08:01:45, Douglas Camin wrote:
> Next year holding an ASN only will be considered a valid path to being a
> general voting member of ARIN, so this limitation will be removed.
>
However this discussion is about moving the candidate talk to a closed list
for this year.
For nex
On 10 Mar 2014, at 16:57, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> While on the surface this might seem prudent, it may be onerous for smaller
> players. More information might be needed to determine adverse cases, or
> possibly some exemption for rural players that might not be able to attain a
> 3rd par