El mar, 22-10-2024 a las 13:57 -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini escribió:
> If individual attribution is needed, it can be obtained using version
> control history.
Yes, but this does not happen when moving a package from AUR to the
official repositories. For example in the case of the package we are
ta
> This isn't about the AUR but about pkgctl
I have done the same exact mistake of archweb vs aurweb
> As such, I don't think a warning for packages that "lack" this makes much
> sense.
Hm, maybe a good addition for namcap though?
> Just to make things clear, this isn't about automating the pro
I am looking to setup an email server for home use.
I want to replace a debian server on a RPI 4 to an archlinux arm on RPI 4.
I have dovecot and postifix on the debian rpi presently. It is not
working as needed.
I have looked at the relative wiki pages for postfix, exim, opensmtpd
and dovec
On 11/4/24 11:09 AM, Pocket wrote:
I am looking to setup an email server for home use.
I want to replace a debian server on a RPI 4 to an archlinux arm on RPI 4.
I have dovecot and postifix on the debian rpi presently. It is not working as
needed.
It matters not what distro you use, it's all L
On 11/4/24 15:50, Polarian wrote:
Just a note,
If this is being done on residential broadband then good luck, its very
unlikely to work.
A large number of ISPs block/filter port 25 (which is used to relay
emails) to "protect against spam". Not to mention the horrific IP
reputations which mos
Just a note,
If this is being done on residential broadband then good luck, its very
unlikely to work.
A large number of ISPs block/filter port 25 (which is used to relay
emails) to "protect against spam". Not to mention the horrific IP
reputations which most email servers will just bounce.
Unle
On 11/4/24 17:44, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 11/4/24 11:09 AM, Pocket wrote:
I am looking to setup an email server for home use.
I want to replace a debian server on a RPI 4 to an archlinux arm on
RPI 4.
I have dovecot and postifix on the debian rpi presently. It is not
working as needed.
On 11/4/24 4:46 PM, Martin Rys wrote:
This isn't about the AUR but about pkgctl
I have done the same exact mistake of archweb vs aurweb
:)
As such, I don't think a warning for packages that "lack" this makes much sense.
Hm, maybe a good addition for namcap though?
Such a warning may b
