I was following this thread and I just have enough time to say that I am
totally agree with Polarian.
Even comments are not required if you don't need others to necessarily read
your words to maintainer. Just email him! It will be threaded by your mail
server automatically.
--
Best Regards,
Ab
Sorry about the double sends, I don't know what happened either... It
seems like Thunderbird (or Gmail) randomly drops received emails before
having me receive them a long time after.
On 2023/12/11 16:07, Polarian wrote:
but whos going to implement them?
That's precisely why I think we shoul
There aren't much expected to be reported at one time, but it's always
better to have a more organized view of them. Features aren't bad if
they don't get in the way of anything, and this one doesn't make the
experience any worse at all. I also think it makes it better in terms of
a better view
On 2023/12/11 8:29, Polarian wrote:
Overcomplicated, and involves even more places to check for issues.
Comment section is good enough for this.
It becomes too many points of failure and too much mental overhead,
juggling issues, comments, emails... its too much... and is why if I do
choose to m
On Mon, 2023-12-11 at 13:29 +, Polarian wrote:
> > 5. Currently,to evaluate whether a AUR package is eligible to move in
> > Arch Linux official packages (extra repo), It only depend on votes
> > and popularity and whether there is a maintainer willing to pick it
> > up. However, those factors
>> 3. The issue and affairs related to which upstream software is
>> included and which PKGBUILD git repo is selected, goes to issues
>> section of aur-meta. For packaging specific problems, it goes to the
>> AUR package git repo.
>
> Overcomplicated, and involves even more places to check for i
El dom, 10-12-2023 a las 12:03 +0100, Jelle van der Waa escribió:
> I understand the demand for having a proper issue tracker and proper
> merge requests.
That's the point.
What the AUR really lacks is precisely this. A complete system of merge
requests and issues, so that the packages are reall
I mean, with differently named AUR packages that provide the same thing,
that sort of already is a thing.
--
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
OpenPGP_0x4E85967FC7C436BE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 at 23:46, Samuele Cistaro -
samuele.cist...@studio.unibo.it
wrote:
>
> (Hi there, it's my first mailing list post ever)
>
> Maybe the solution could be a multi-PKGBUILD system where you can choose
> which one to use, based on various criteria
> However, I am afraid that this w
On 2023-12-10 12:03, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
I understand the demand for having a proper issue tracker and proper
merge requests. But splitting the information in two places is a no no
for me and makes the whole situation rather confusing.
Is there a way to “disown” packages in GitLab, e.g. r
> There is indeed a lack of Pull Requests, which would make it vastly
> easier to contribute. It would be interesting if someone can figure out
> how easy it is to implement that into the AUR.
Typically one would just make a patch file and link to it in a
comment. Even if the owner does not apply
Hi Bjoern,
have a look at the general guidelines for mailing lists [1].
--
tippfehlr
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/General_guidelines#Mailing_lists
uh, hope you solve
Da: StealthMode Hu
Inviato: domenica 10 dicembre 2023 21:13
A: Samuele Cistaro - samuele.cist...@studio.unibo.it
Cc: Bjoern Franke ; arch-general@lists.archlinux.org
Oggetto: Re: Proposal about AUR affairs
It is not your fault Friend
ealthMode Hu
> *Inviato:* domenica 10 dicembre 2023 20:05
> *A:* Samuele Cistaro - samuele.cist...@studio.unibo.it <
> samuele.cist...@studio.unibo.it>
> *Cc:* Bjoern Franke ; arch-general@lists.archlinux.org
>
> *Oggetto:* Re: Proposal about AUR affairs
>
> I did
staro - samuele.cist...@studio.unibo.it
Cc: Bjoern Franke ; arch-general@lists.archlinux.org
Oggetto: Re: Proposal about AUR affairs
I did not sign up for anything with you.Please pull the server IP traffic logs
for this email / signup.Cross reference whatever time on your system logs that
this email wa
nica 10 dicembre 2023 13:52
> *A:* arch-general@lists.archlinux.org
> *Oggetto:* Re: Proposal about AUR affairs
>
> Hi,
>
> > There is indeed a lack of Pull Requests, which would make it vastly
> > easier to contribute. It would be interesting if someone can figure out
joern Franke
Inviato: domenica 10 dicembre 2023 13:52
A: arch-general@lists.archlinux.org
Oggetto: Re: Proposal about AUR affairs
Hi,
> There is indeed a lack of Pull Requests, which would make it vastly
> easier to contribute. It would be interesting if someone can figure out
> how
Hi,
There is indeed a lack of Pull Requests, which would make it vastly
easier to contribute. It would be interesting if someone can figure out
how easy it is to implement that into the AUR.
this would indeed make things easier, when some AUR user has a fix for a
problem etc.
This is not a
Hi,
On 09-12-2023 14:18, Evan Greenup wrote:
Hello,
AUR is a unique feature for Arch Linux (include derived distros). It
significantly expand the Arch ecosystem.
However, for the current infrastructure and workflow for AUR, there are some
drawbacks.
1. Difficult to feedback and difficult to
For 1., comments on AUR packages exist. You don't have to manually send emails.
--
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
OpenPGP_0x4E85967FC7C436BE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I love the proposal, and funny enough: It was actually one of the original
proposals of the rewritten aurweb v3 when it was moved to the git backend.
On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 01:18:57PM +, Evan Greenup wrote:
> I have some ideas to resolve or mitigate the problems above.
>
> 1. Create a git re
Hello,
AUR is a unique feature for Arch Linux (include derived distros). It
significantly expand the Arch ecosystem.
However, for the current infrastructure and workflow for AUR, there are some
drawbacks.
1. Difficult to feedback and difficult to contribute (to already existed
package). If h
22 matches
Mail list logo
