> This isn't about the AUR but about pkgctl
I have done the same exact mistake of archweb vs aurweb
> As such, I don't think a warning for packages that "lack" this makes much
> sense.
Hm, maybe a good addition for namcap though?
> Just to make things clear, this isn't about automating the pro
While I'm sure fixing this is a great learning experience, keep in mind
that the version is EOL, and as such has no security patches, meaning you
should in no case be running it directly on a host system (bad idea to have
services there in the first place if you can avoid it).
I recommend you thro
Can a warning be added to packages that lack this to aurweb?
CTRL+F for nvcheck also finds nothing on the wiki
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_User_Repository
As someone who maintains a bunch of stuff in the AUR, I've had no idea
about this.
I see it the way to set it up is mentioned here,
namcap both the resulting package and the PKGBUILD.
> unclear whether I should list debugedit as a build dependency
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_User_Repository#Prerequisites
Martin
On Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 11:01 PM David C. Rankin wrote:
>
> On 11/1/24 1:23 PM, Robin Candau wrote:
> >
I think that at minimum even an automated email with
"Hey the package you maintained on AUR is now in extra/blah, your
repository or parts of it may or may not have been used, thank you for
your contributions!"
sent to the Maintainer and Co-Maintainers of the package at the time
would go a long way
> conflicts with what the guide says[1], doesn't it?
> "If you are assuming the role of maintainer for an existing PKGBUILD"
Based on what has been said in this thread, I don't think so.
They did not take maintainership over an existing PKGBUILD, they wrote
a new one from scratch, and disabled th
Arch Linux still uses the legacy iptables backend, as opposed to the
nft backend that every other distribution uses.
This has been reported since 2021 with no response:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/iptables/-/issues/1
To me it looks like a direct, simple migration, an
Would be nice to use -MM-DD in international channels, which is
ISO8601 and there is no -DD-MM standard in existence or use to
confuse it with.
dkms has had multiple hanging PRs for some time -
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/dkms/-/merge_requests/3
and the change
KeePassXC on desktops, editable, autosynced.
KeePassDX on phone, read-only, syncing that fast enough without
conflicts was more trouble than what was worth.
Database synced via self-hosted Nextcloud (pick your poison for the
syncing method).
Non-bruteforceable password for the database file, databa
Yeah so this is a new one https://github.com/nextcloud/desktop/issues/6863
Martin
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 12:22 PM Silvio Siefke wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> > Nextcloud does not care about your permissions.
> >
> > You can try this by creating a file, doing chmod 777 on it and then
> > syncing on anoth
Nextcloud does not care about your permissions.
You can try this by creating a file, doing chmod 777 on it and then
syncing on another machine, it will be synced with 644.
Synchronizing permissions "would be bad for security", if you track
down the relevant bug report.
Yes, this is stupid.
Mart
I'd have made this on GitLab but don't have access right now - why ditch
the upstream systemd units and hardcore them?
Wouldn't it be better to source the new packaging repo instead?
https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin-packaging/
Martin
On Mon, May 27, 2024, 19:09 Florian Wetzel wrote:
> Hi,
> this still brings some new features that might be required by other packages
There are zero required-by's on those two packages, except between themselves.
>What would be the appropriate action if the current maintainer does not
>release a update soon?
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Package
The current UX is terrible, it explicitly lies to the user, as was
explained in my earlier message, and someone else explaining systems now
say that either username or login being wrong, but not which one.
Same here, if you're adding a third thing, simply say that the third thing
could also be the
This is now released with pam 1.6.1 and shipped in Arch Linux.
Pretty sure it caused my issue here -
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pipewire/pipewire/-/issues/3532
Will see how a rebooted system behaves now.
Martin
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 12:09 AM Martin Rys wrote:
>
> That explains
i there,
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 11:36:43AM +0200, Martin Rys wrote:
> > > FYI, the "idiotic default" may feel less annoying when you use the
> > > documented solution
> >
> > Would be great if one got this as an error message when the logins
>
-Dobias
wrote:
>
> On Friday, 12 April 2024 at 10:10 (+0200), Martin Rys wrote:
> >Are you sure you're not just hitting the new(old at this point) idiotic
> >default of always failing after X failed attempts in Y time? That would
> >mean you mistyped the password a few tim
Are you sure you're not just hitting the new(old at this point)
idiotic default of always failing after X failed attempts in Y time?
That would mean you mistyped the password a few times, but afterwards
it would not matter even if you typed it correctly.
Rebooting will get you out of the timelock
Did anyone try proposing changes to the actual upstream Linux default
instead of just hacking it higher downstream?
Doesn't look like it's even configurable at the moment, based on the
Fedora document.
Martin
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 5:08 PM Rein Fernhout (Levitating)
wrote:
>
> Seeing as other
Also a note, depending on your needs, ICO that's a PNG is valid.
Martin
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 8:51 AM Óscar García Amor wrote:
>
> El mar, 19-03-2024 a las 19:57 -0500, David C. Rankin escribió:
> > I still need the png2ico utility
>
> As far as I know, you can perfectly replace png2ico with i
That explains a lot, thanks for digging into this.
I've had pw constantly run into ulimits and failed to find out why.
Martin
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024, 21:19 Simone Baratta wrote:
> Howdy, Arch community!
>
> Today Ardour warned me that I had a ulimit enforced for locked memory,
> and indeed I was
If you had the configuration autoreplaced it would mean you never edited it
- in which case you'd be building packages on a single thread... Surely not?
Martin
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, 14:41 Ryan Petris wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, at 4:38 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
>
> On 3/7/24 12:34, lacsaP Patate
Doesn't look like it's user error.
https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/1b67kih/libblockdevutils_and_upgrade_dilema/
Martin
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 7:32 AM Genes Lists wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2024-03-03 at 14:06 -0800, David Bohman wrote:
> >
> > :..
>
> > : Replace libblockdev-utils with
I'm not familiar with vagrant, but did you verify that the server listening
on indeed has the two keys you're trying to use in authorized_keys for
a2sdk?
I'd put that server in debug mode and see that instead, as it seems your
client simply tries the keys and server denies them.
Martin
On F
Good job figuring it out.
If updating UEFI(that's a UEFI board, not a BIOS one, though it's not
much relevant here) and re-enabling the PCI-E resume still exhibits
the issue, you should report a bug, presumably to the kernel.
Might've already been fixed by now if the people from that 2011 thread
Would probably be a good idea to try from an up to date system before
looking into this further.
Second suspicion would be weird UEFI behavior, although unlikely, so
make sure UEFI is up to date.
If it still persists on an up to date OS and FW
* What does freezes mean, kernel dies - no num/caps l
> I actually had to do a complete reinstall .
Have you actually checked the logs to see what exactly was failing
before resorting to that?
Someone in the Telegram group had a broken filesystem with a 0 byte
kwallet xml file which was breaking the new dbus, it's apparently more
strict than the old
Since nobody in this thread either reported the bug or edited the
wiki, I've at least done the former.
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/nextcloud/-/issues/5
Would be nice if someone else fixes the wiki up.
Martin
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 3:06 AM David C. Rankin wrote:
>
% pacman -Fyx
'usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/setuptools/config/__pycache__/expand.cpython-311.opt-1.pyc'
usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/setuptools/config/__pycache__/expand.cpython-311.opt-1.pyc
is owned by extra/python-setuptools 1:69.0.2-1
>>> reinstall python-setuptools
Repeat for every
It would usually be upstream unless you have a reason to believe Arch
is at fault.
https://community.kde.org/Get_Involved/Issue_Reporting
A lot of Wayland related issues on Plasma were only solved with Qt 6,
and thus in Plasma 6, today the second Plasma 6 beta should be coming
out if you want to h
I use nextcloud with nginx rather than Apache, but is there something
preventing you from using the default htaccess and configuring what you
need on the webserver side instead?
Martin
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023, 22:30 David C. Rankin wrote:
> Devs, David, All,
>
>I've now gone though 3 Nextcloud
Chmod won't do anything, I've raised this issue on the Talk section of
the page, see it for details and solutions.
Martin
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 1:20 AM Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
> The systemd boot instruction just after bootctl install could probably use
> an addition.
> When I tried this yesterd
Sounds like you did a partial upgrade, it was rebuilt -
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/electron25/-/commit/c1e450809ccf7cbe0c65d9c997a51ef0a419b600
pacman -Q electron25 will probably give you 25.9.0-1 instead of -2.
Martin
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 12:38 AM Christian
wro
What have you tried?
You can follow the grub wiki page for instructions.
If archinstall created an ESP partition, you likely used UEFI boot mode so
it installed as such.
Martin
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023, 02:58 Jude DaShiell wrote:
> I used it earlier since I couldn't make sense of the efi and uefi
>
I can imagine you could try to push for it being included with
wireguard-tools, since it provides the scripts being run, or use a
configuration management tool like Ansible to push unit files into
your machine, which could also make sure the unit is enabled too.
Martin
On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 8:38
What's the output of `file ~/.ssh/siefke_key; ls -lah ~/.ssh/siefke_key`?
Martin
On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 3:17 PM Silvio Siefke wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I try to connect remote maschines over SSH but with all servers I become
> message:
>
> Load key ".ssh/siefke_key": error in libcrypto
> siefke@192
, Jun 14, 2023 at 6:28 PM Felix Yan wrote:
>
> On 5/17/23 18:47, Martin Rys wrote:
> > Is Arch going to be adopting this behavior too? I could not find a
> > discussion anywhere else about this.
>
> python 3.11.3-2 has implemented this. Thanks for sharing!
>
> --
> Regards,
> Felix Yan
>
Some time ago, PEP 668[1] enabled distributions to mark the python
installation as externally managed by a package manager, thus
preventing pip from breaking the system by either installing packages
to the system or locally in the home folder.
Debian has already adopted this[2].
>From my understa
38 matches
Mail list logo
