On 18-10-2024 08:35, Jaron Kent-Dobias wrote:
On Thursday, 17 October 2024 at 21:16 (-0500), David C. Rankin wrote:
On 10/17/24 6:44 AM, Jaron Kent-Dobias wrote:
If nftables automatically uninstalls iptables as an indirect
dependency, then no, the default should not change. That would seem
t
archlinux.org/thread/2ZBKMGFFDTCVMGCPF4JM6KD5RHS6N54D/
Lone_Wolf
On 30-12-2023 07:44, David C. Rankin wrote:
Archdevs,
Not sure where this should go, but the CSS for in
https://man.archlinux.org/man/tmpfiles.d.5.en is causing the
information to wrap. Changing zoom or browser window size doesn't
change the width of the blocks and the text wraps in an a
at-security" cd "$srcdir/$pkgname"
QUICKJS_INCLUDE="/usr/include/quickjs" QUICKJS_LIB="/usr/lib/quickjs/"
make } package() { cd "$srcdir/$pkgname/src" make DESTDIR="$pkgdir"
PREFIX=/usr install install -Dm644 ../doc/man-edbrowse-debian.1
$pkgdir
Also chromium is in repos, you may be trying to build another package
(like ungoogled-chromium, google-chrome etc)
Please start a new thread with clear info which package you're trying to
build.
Prepend comands with LC_ALL=C to ensure their output will be in english.
Lone_Wolf
On 25-11-2023 16:57, Jude DaShiell wrote:
https://www.panix.com/~jdashiel/edbrowse-git-log.zip
has the four logs this build fail produced.
Something went wrong with the upload. I get "You don't have permission
to access this resource." and the size of the file is shown as 1.1k .
I can do
On 25-11-2023 01:21, Jude DaShiell wrote:
With --cleanbuild and -f options added after having erased
~/share/yay/edbrowse-git and ~/.share/yay/quickjs I got:
==> Starting package()...
mkdir -p -m 755 /home/jude/builds/edbrowse-git/pkg/edbrowse-git/usr/bin
install -m755 edbrowse /home/jude/build
On 24-11-2023 23:45, Jude DaShiell wrote:
install -m755 edbrowse /home/jude/builds/edbrowse-git/pkg/edbrowse-git/usr/bin
install: cannot stat 'edbrowse': No such file or directory
make: *** [makefile:82: install] Error 1
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package().
Aborting...
That file s
UICKJS_INCLUDE="/usr/include/quickjs" QUICKJS_LIB="/usr/lib/quickjs/" make
The package builds for me that way, but I haven't ran the software.
Lone_Wolf
FLAGS} -Wno-format-security" in the PKGBUILD
That line is not a patch but changes build flags . Try putting it as
first line in the build() function
(or package function if it doesn't have a build() function)
Lone_Wolf
https://translatewiki.net/wiki/Portal:Bn
Lone_Wolf
ealise
is that --overwrite requires a parameter like to-be-deleted-file.css .
man pacman for details.
There's another more important issue though :
Why do you feel the need to run pacman -U through pacstrap instead of
directly ?
Lone_Wolf
On 21-09-2023 01:52, David C. Rankin wrote:
archlinux-keyring-wkd-sync flies under the RADAR on install as a
dependent package whose service file is automatically. Rather than the
user having to do something more to ensure archlinux-keyring-wkd-sync
can run,
archlinux-keyring-wkd-sync uses
price tag .
Personally I feel SB disadvantages massively outweight the benefits.
Lone_Wolf
On 18-05-2023 13:48, Genes Lists wrote:
On 5/18/23 06:26, Lone_Wolf wrote:
On 17-05-2023 18:31, Genes Lists wrote:
have several packages where in the install section of PKGBUILD it
does something like:
pipopts="--isolated --ignore-installed --no-deps"
pip $pipopts install --ro
On 17-05-2023 18:31, Genes Lists wrote:
have several packages where in the install section of PKGBUILD it
does something like:
pipopts="--isolated --ignore-installed --no-deps"
pip $pipopts install --root=$pkgdir dist/*.whl
Those packages are NOT following the python package guidelines
On 16-05-2023 13:09, Óscar García Amor wrote:
El mar, 16-05-2023 a las 09:22 +0200, Uwe Sauter escribió:
Boot the ISO, check /proc/cmdline for the options passed to the
kernel.
That option is not valid as the kernel parameters passed are dependent
on booting from the ISO. The values are:
ar
On 12-04-2023 09:55, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Hi,
some kernels that do boot on my old UEFI computer with legacy boot
enabled, don't boot on my new UEFI computer were the Intel processor
graphics doesn't allow to enable legacy boot, but at least _secure boot_
is _disabled_.
What can I do to get rid
On 28-03-2023 23:45, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
The reason for the netctl failure turned out to be that dhcpcd
was not installed. Which was a bit of surprise, because netctl
needs it.
It seems netctl has gained some flexibility and dhcpcd is now an
optional dependency .
Check 'pacman -Si netc
Ralph and Eric had the same idea, creating a list of packages installed
as dependencies and use that for the new system.
While that will probably work I feel it's error-prone and to much work.
Maybe this is an X-Y problem.
Why is having to answer the N-providers-for-X questions a problem ?
On 28-03-2023 14:42, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi LW,
If I wanted to duplicate the packages from one machine to another
then I'd like the method to not alter the source machine, preserve
my choices, and that some packages weren't explicitly wanted.
In other words, duplicate.
...
...could you ex
On 28-03-2023 11:41, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi LW,
Incase you don't want those questions, check which package you prefer
to provide that dependency, change it's install reason to explicit and
regenerate the list.
That seems like a bit of a bodge though. If I wanted to duplicate the
packages
On 28-03-2023 09:22, Spencer Collyer wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:30:04 +0200, Uwe Koloska wrote:
Am 26.03.23 um 09:25 schrieb David Runge:
On 2023-03-26 07:55:06 (+0100), Spencer Collyer wrote:
I'm installing a new system, and using the instructions at
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Pacm
vidia card increases that number by a lot .
Sometimes there's even a simple solution like using the latest efi
firmware for your laptop ,
Open a topic on archlinux forum. Aside from journalctl output also add
the output of lspci -k, your X / wayland setup and try to describe the
problem in detail.
Lone_Wolf
right ?
Lone_Wolf
int?
Thanks for the suggestion, I'll look into it.
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
There may be a much better solution, see
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=283327
Lone_Wolf
ied
below from arch-dev-public) makes it .
Lone_Wolf
So let me make a concrete proposal.
1. Put openrc in [community] which I have used on my laptop for two
years without issue.
2. Make it depend on systemd (so it is clear we are not packaging eudev)
and make installation print a warning tha
ated in another
way and you'll have to figure out what that way is.|
|A pacman hook is a possibility, but neither nvidia nor nvidia-utils
does appear to install a pacman hook .|
|
|
|Lone_Wolf
|
||
|
|
like that library will require a new version .
I can't find sequoia-octopus-librnp in archlinux repos or aur, are you
sure arch-general ML is the right place to report this ?
Lone_Wolf
.
It installs a hook that runs on updates to check for direct dependencies.
Run as a separate command it can perfrom more thorough checking.
Lone_Wolf
erent formats) , but nothing
that stands out to me as useful for normal users.
What information in the readme do you and OP feel is useful and not
available through man / info pages ?
Lone_Wolf
without
support for this hardware, so there is still time to prepare for this.
Lone_Wolf
[1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/10153
On 06-07-2021 09:33, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
On 7/4/21 10:49 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
See the release notes for pacman 6 at:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/raw/master/NEWS
- an additional progress bar is added to track total download progress.
On 28-06-2021 19:43, Olivier Langlois via arch-general wrote:
Bottomline, hopefully the PKGFILE is still available somewhere so that
someone can move it in AUR...
Someone already moved it to aur, see
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/liboping/
On 07-06-2021 10:46, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
On 6/6/21 2:56 AM, Ralph Corderoy via arch-general wrote:
Hi David,
Why the informative text output from a package manager should use
anything other than basic terminal capabilities seems to fly in the
face of the Arch KISS philoso
orted.
Atleast one terminal emulator (qterminal ) has already been found not to
support those , see https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=266831 .
Are those 3 machines using different terminal emulators ?
Lone_Wolf
On 15-05-2021 12:25, Lone_Wolf via arch-general wrote:
On 14-05-2021 23:06, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
On 5/13/21 9:29 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-dev-public wrote:
Hi,
...
Also, if you guys notice any issues, let me know.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
Hi
FYI, I&#x
On 14-05-2021 23:06, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
On 5/13/21 9:29 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-dev-public wrote:
Hi,
...
Also, if you guys notice any issues, let me know.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
Hi
FYI, I've come across one issue which was triggered after updating to
38 matches
Mail list logo
