Re: [arch-general] NEW RECORD! 769 packages out of date

2021-11-03 Thread Christopher W. via arch-general
On Wednesday, November 3rd, 2021 at 5:37 AM, Morten Linderud wrote: > > First of all: Trans rights are not politics. It's about human rights. Do you see the fallacy here? You've taken a controversial opinion, assumed it as fact, and framed the rest of the self-justification around that. "Trans

Re: [arch-general] NEW RECORD! 769 packages out of date

2021-11-03 Thread Christopher W. via arch-general
On Wednesday, November 3rd, 2021 at 4:27 AM, Morten Linderud via arch-general wrote: > On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 08:17:37AM +0100, Antonio Rojas via arch-general > wrote: > Now, > > Please stop posting FUD people. This all started with a misguided reddit > thread > > and currentl spun on 4chan as

Re: [arch-general] Fwd: A plea for communication from Arch devs & maintainers

2021-11-02 Thread Christopher W. via arch-general
On Tuesday, November 2nd, 2021 at 9:33 PM, mar77i via arch-general wrote: > > Where can I post updated PKGBUILDs for review and addition to testing in > order to help? Nowhere. Arch does not allow users to submit updates via the bug tracker. If they did, and actually accepted them, I think the

[arch-general] One maintainer, 100+ outdated packages

2021-05-08 Thread Christopher W. via arch-general
Over a hundred packages with anthraxx listed as the maintainer have been flagged out of date: https://archlinux.org/packages/?sort=&q=&maintainer=anthraxx&flagged=Flagged Many open bug reports are assigned to him too: https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?dev=17958 (In the past, bug reports wit

[arch-general] makepkg default flags

2021-02-02 Thread Christopher W. via arch-general
A few months back there was a proposal to edit the default makepkg build flags for improved security: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2020-July/030031.html As far as I can tell, this was never committed. The show-stopper at the time was Clang 11 not being released yet. Now