Does adding
ILoveCandy
to /etc/pacman.conf make a difference?
I don't notice a progress bar issue. My setup:
$ grep IL /etc/pacman.conf
ILoveCandy
$ pacman -Qi roxterm | grep On
Depends On : dbus-glib vte3 hicolor-icon-theme
$ pacman -Q roxterm vte3
roxterm 3.11.1-1
vte3 0.64.1-1
On 6/3/21 4:59 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
On 6/3/21 1:00 PM, David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
On 6/3/21 1:09 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
I did all 3 updates from different tabs in the same konsole (KDE), so the
terminal is VT100 compatible. It rea
On 6/3/21 1:00 PM, David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
>
>
> On 6/3/21 1:09 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
>> I did all 3 updates from different tabs in the same konsole (KDE), so the
>> terminal is VT100 compatible. It really looked like there was a bad ANSI
>> escape somewhe
On 2021-06-03 at 14:00:08 -0400,
David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
> On 6/3/21 1:09 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
> > I did all 3 updates from different tabs in the same konsole (KDE), so the
> > terminal is VT100 compatible. It really looked like there was a bad ANSI
> > e
On 6/3/21 1:09 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
I did all 3 updates from different tabs in the same konsole (KDE), so the
terminal is VT100 compatible. It really looked like there was a bad ANSI
escape somewhere. It was night/day different than the last time I updated and
I've proba
On 6/3/21 4:17 AM, Lone_Wolf via arch-general wrote:
> The new progressbar requires specific escape codes (part of VT100 terminal
> definition I think) to be supported.
>
> Atleast one terminal emulator (qterminal ) has already been found not to
> support those , see https://bbs.archlinux.org/view
On 6/3/21 4:05 AM, Anton Hvornum via arch-general wrote:
> Just to make sure, you're not using archinstall when that "jumping around"
> happens right? Because if that's the case, then it's my fault and not
> pacman :)
>
Right, this is plain old 'pacman -Syu' on 3 boxes that have been running sinc
On 03-06-2021 10:37, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
On 6/1/21 6:57 PM, Jonathon Fernyhough via arch-general wrote:
On 01/06/2021 23:15, Yash Karandikar via arch-general wrote:
My guess is that they'll update that once pacman 6 hits stable.
pacman=6.0.0-2 is already in stable. ;)
F
Just to make sure, you're not using archinstall when that "jumping around"
happens right? Because if that's the case, then it's my fault and not
pacman :)
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021, 10:34 David C. Rankin via arch-general, <
arch-general@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 6/1/21 6:57 PM, Jonathon Fernyhoug
On 6/1/21 6:57 PM, Jonathon Fernyhough via arch-general wrote:
> On 01/06/2021 23:15, Yash Karandikar via arch-general wrote:
>> My guess is that they'll update that once pacman 6 hits stable.
>
> pacman=6.0.0-2 is already in stable. ;)
>
Follow up on my earlier report of jittery output on pacma
On 6/1/21 6:57 PM, Jonathon Fernyhough via arch-general wrote:
> On 01/06/2021 23:15, Yash Karandikar via arch-general wrote:
>> My guess is that they'll update that once pacman 6 hits stable.
>
> pacman=6.0.0-2 is already in stable. ;)
>
and it has terminal output issues bigtime. Whatever is ca
11 matches
Mail list logo
