Re: [arch-general] Wiki edition

Hi Rafael, Em qua, 30 de out de 2019 às 20:16, Rafael Fontenelle escreveu: > > Hi Tomas, > > Em qua, 30 de out de 2019 às 15:48, Tomas Schertel via arch-general > escreveu: > > > > Hi guys. > > > > I have a Brazilian Lenovo Ideapad 330S-14IKB laptop and would like to add > > it to Wiki. > > I kn

Re: [arch-general] Wiki edition

Hi Tomas, Em qua, 30 de out de 2019 às 15:48, Tomas Schertel via arch-general escreveu: > > Hi guys. > > I have a Brazilian Lenovo Ideapad 330S-14IKB laptop and would like to add > it to Wiki. > I know there is a Lenovo 330S page, but it shows a different version. > How can I proceed to create a

[arch-general] Wiki edition

Hi guys. I have a Brazilian Lenovo Ideapad 330S-14IKB laptop and would like to add it to Wiki. I know there is a Lenovo 330S page, but it shows a different version. How can I proceed to create a new page or change the current one? Sorry to ask this, but I don't have much experience on Wikis. Than

Re: [arch-general] [wiki cleanup] Links to non-existent packages

On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Jakub Klinkovský wrote: > Hello all, > > as of today, there are exactly 714 invalid uses (413 unique) of Template:AUR > [1] > or Template:Pkg [2] on the wiki, spread across 398 pages. The complete list is > on [3]. > > I will try to go through it and update the lin

[arch-general] [wiki cleanup] Links to non-existent packages

Hello all, as of today, there are exactly 714 invalid uses (413 unique) of Template:AUR [1] or Template:Pkg [2] on the wiki, spread across 398 pages. The complete list is on [3]. I will try to go through it and update the links, but this is not a one-man job, so I would really appreciate some hel

Re: [arch-general] Wiki

On 11/16/2011 12:25 AM, Albino Biasutti Neto wrote: > It´s normalizing. > > Why the problem ? > > Thank you and cheers, > a cache table used by forums was corrupted and mysql did some crazy things when trying to recover. > 2011/11/15 Karol Blazewicz > >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Io

Re: [arch-general] Wiki

It´s normalizing. Why the problem ? Thank you and cheers, 2011/11/15 Karol Blazewicz > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: > > On 11/15/2011 11:58 PM, Albino Biasutti Neto wrote: > >> Hello. > >> > >> The problem in Wiki ? No acess. > >> > >> wiki.archlinux.org > >> > >> Cheer

Re: [arch-general] Wiki

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: > On 11/15/2011 11:58 PM, Albino Biasutti Neto wrote: >> Hello. >> >> The problem in Wiki ? No acess. >> >> wiki.archlinux.org >> >> Cheers, > > it should be up soonish > > -- > Ionuț > > It's already working for me, thanks :-)

Re: [arch-general] Wiki

On 11/15/2011 11:58 PM, Albino Biasutti Neto wrote: > Hello. > > The problem in Wiki ? No acess. > > wiki.archlinux.org > > Cheers, it should be up soonish -- Ionuț signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] Wiki

2011/11/15 Albino Biasutti Neto : > Hello. > > The problem in Wiki ? No acess. > > wiki.archlinux.org > > Cheers, > -- > Albino Biasutti Neto > www.tux-es.org > www.binoinformatica.com > > "A mente que se abre a uma nova idéia jamais volta ao seu tamanho > origina

[arch-general] Wiki

Hello. The problem in Wiki ? No acess. wiki.archlinux.org Cheers, -- Albino Biasutti Neto www.tux-es.org www.binoinformatica.com "A mente que se abre a uma nova idéia jamais volta ao seu tamanho original". Albert Einstein Chave GPG: 1A867107

Re: [arch-general] Wiki & forum down?

On 10/24/2011 06:58 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: On 10/24/2011 06:37 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: While we're at it, what it the preferred way to contact our Dear Arch Overlords if something is malfunctioning? Pierre said "try to contact us immedi

Re: [arch-general] Wiki & forum down?

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: > On 10/24/2011 06:37 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: >> While we're at it, what it the preferred way to contact our Dear Arch >> Overlords if something is malfunctioning? >> Pierre said "try to contact us immediately" >> https://bbs.archlinux.org/view

Re: [arch-general] Wiki & forum down?

On 10/24/2011 06:37 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: On 10/24/2011 05:30 PM, Taylor Hedberg wrote: Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and forum seem to have been down for at least a few hours now (I think they are located

Re: [arch-general] Wiki & forum down?

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: > On 10/24/2011 05:30 PM, Taylor Hedberg wrote: >> >> Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and forum >> seem to have been down for at least a few hours now (I think they are >> located on the same host). Does anyone know w

Re: [arch-general] Wiki & forum down?

On 10/24/2011 05:30 PM, Taylor Hedberg wrote: Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and forum seem to have been down for at least a few hours now (I think they are located on the same host). Does anyone know what the situation is? the services had come back online in the

Re: [arch-general] Wiki & forum down?

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Taylor Hedberg wrote: > Jelle van der Waa, Mon 2011-10-24 @ 16:41:53+0200: >> For now: Use google Cache, way back machine? Else pacman -Ss arch wiki >> (it's from 15 october so it should be fine) > > Thanks, I didn't know the wiki was available as a downloadable pa

Re: [arch-general] Wiki & forum down?

Jelle van der Waa, Mon 2011-10-24 @ 16:41:53+0200: > For now: Use google Cache, way back machine? Else pacman -Ss arch wiki > (it's from 15 october so it should be fine) Thanks, I didn't know the wiki was available as a downloadable package. That will suffice for now.

Re: [arch-general] Wiki & forum down?

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:30:26AM -0400, Taylor Hedberg wrote: > Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and forum > seem to have been down for at least a few hours now (I think they are > located on the same host). Does anyone know what the situation is? There has been a ha

Re: [arch-general] Wiki & forum down?

Paul Gideon Dann, Mon 2011-10-24 @ 15:35:58+0100: > They both look fine to me. Maybe an issue with your local DNS? Strange, I've tried it from multiple hosts, including remote hosts in other cities/on other ISPs, all with the same result, no response from the server. I haven't seen a problem with

Re: [arch-general] Wiki & forum down?

On Monday 24 Oct 2011 09:38:19 Dwight Schauer wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote: > > On Monday 24 Oct 2011 10:30:26 Taylor Hedberg wrote: > >> Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and > >> forum > >> seem to have been down for at least a few

Re: [arch-general] Wiki & forum down?

On 24/10/11 16:38, Dwight Schauer wrote: On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote: On Monday 24 Oct 2011 10:30:26 Taylor Hedberg wrote: Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and forum seem to have been down for at least a few hours now (I think they are l

Re: [arch-general] Wiki & forum down?

Le Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:38:19 -0500, Dwight Schauer a écrit : > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Paul Gideon Dann > wrote: > > On Monday 24 Oct 2011 10:30:26 Taylor Hedberg wrote: > >> Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and > >> forum seem to have been down for at least

Re: [arch-general] Wiki & forum down?

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote: > On Monday 24 Oct 2011 10:30:26 Taylor Hedberg wrote: >> Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and forum >> seem to have been down for at least a few hours now (I think they are >> located on the same host). Does any

Re: [arch-general] Wiki & forum down?

On Monday 24 Oct 2011 10:30:26 Taylor Hedberg wrote: > Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and forum > seem to have been down for at least a few hours now (I think they are > located on the same host). Does anyone know what the situation is? They both look fine to me. Ma

[arch-general] Wiki & forum down?

Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but both the wiki and forum seem to have been down for at least a few hours now (I think they are located on the same host). Does anyone know what the situation is?

Re: [arch-general] Wiki entry for GPGPU / OpenCL / CUDA

2011/8/10 Karol Blazewicz : > Unfortunately you added your article to categories that don't exist ;-) > The categories should read > [[Category:Development (English)]] > [[Category:Graphics (English)]] > instead of > [[Category:Category:Development (English)]] > [[Category:Category:Graphics (Englis

Re: [arch-general] Wiki entry for GPGPU / OpenCL / CUDA

2011/8/10 Vojtěch Král : > Jesus I obivously have a great "knack" for moving stuff around on wiki :O > Sorry for all the mess, should be ok now, with categories and everything... > ~kralyk > > 2011/8/10 Karol Blazewicz : >> 2011/8/10 Vojtěch Král : >>> Okay, I made a few more touches to the article

Re: [arch-general] Wiki entry for GPGPU / OpenCL / CUDA

Jesus I obivously have a great "knack" for moving stuff around on wiki :O Sorry for all the mess, should be ok now, with categories and everything... ~kralyk 2011/8/10 Karol Blazewicz : > 2011/8/10 Vojtěch Král : >> Okay, I made a few more touches to the article and I think it's >> getting quite c

Re: [arch-general] Wiki entry for GPGPU / OpenCL / CUDA

2011/8/10 Vojtěch Král : > Okay, I made a few more touches to the article and I think it's > getting quite complete... > May I publish it yet? > ~kralyk > +1 from me, go ahead and remember to add it to some categories :-)

Re: [arch-general] Wiki entry for GPGPU / OpenCL / CUDA

Okay, I made a few more touches to the article and I think it's getting quite complete... May I publish it yet? ~kralyk

Re: [arch-general] Wiki entry for GPGPU / OpenCL / CUDA

Dne 9. srpna 2011 11:06 Thomas Jost napsal(a): > I added some stuff about CUDA (I'm the maintainer of the > cuda-{toolkit,sdk} packages on the AUR) and Nvidia's OpenCL (not > familiar with it though). There is room for improvements, but it should > be enough for a start. HTH. Thanks! > Should th

Re: [arch-general] Wiki entry for GPGPU / OpenCL / CUDA

Vojtěch Král (2011-08-09 03:14): > Hey everyone,... > From recent discussions about troubles with OpenCL as well as > comments in AUR, > forums, etc.. I got the impression that the whole thing is pretty > confusing for an outsider... and for an insider too for that matter. > So I put up a wiki ent

Re: [arch-general] Wiki entry for GPGPU / OpenCL / CUDA

On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 03:14:04 +0200, Vojtěch Král wrote: > Hey everyone,... > From recent discussions about troubles with OpenCL as well as > comments in AUR, > forums, etc.. I got the impression that the whole thing is pretty > confusing for an outsider... and for an insider too for that matter. >

Re: [arch-general] Wiki entry for GPGPU / OpenCL / CUDA

Hi, thanks for response. I just redesigned the article a bit, hope it's still ok ;-) I'll have a look at that imagemagick's opencl, I'll see what I can find out... ~kralyk 2011/8/9 XeCycle : > Vojtěch Král writes: > >> Hey everyone,... >>  From recent discussions about troubles with OpenCL as wel

Re: [arch-general] Wiki entry for GPGPU / OpenCL / CUDA

Vojtěch Král writes: > Hey everyone,... > From recent discussions about troubles with OpenCL as well as > comments in AUR, > forums, etc.. I got the impression that the whole thing is pretty > confusing for an outsider... and for an insider too for that matter. > So I put up a wiki entry. > > So

[arch-general] Wiki entry for GPGPU / OpenCL / CUDA

Hey everyone,... From recent discussions about troubles with OpenCL as well as comments in AUR, forums, etc.. I got the impression that the whole thing is pretty confusing for an outsider... and for an insider too for that matter. So I put up a wiki entry. So far it's a wip article on my wiki pro

[arch-general] Wiki license?

Hi, I was checking the wiki license, that says GNU FDL 1.2, but links to GNU FDL 1.3, so... which one should I pick? :) -- Salud! Nicolás Reynolds, xmpp:fa...@kiwwwi.com.ar omb:http://identi.ca/fauno blog:http://selfdandi.com.ar/ gnu/linux user #455044 OTR: C0CB1F0F 01DB5E18 2D634C2A A4626858 E7

Re: [arch-general] wiki - Add a border to Template:Article summary start ?

On 03/03/2011 01:29 PM, Desmond Cox wrote: > More appropriate locations for this discussion would be the template > talk page itself: > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Template_talk:Article_summary_start&action=edit&redlink=1 Thank you Desmond. I added it there and then applied it

Re: [arch-general] wiki - Add a border to Template:Article summary start ?

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:48 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Guys, > >  I was working with Template:Article summary start code for the wiki trying to > come up with a way to further define it on the page so you don't end up with > it > appearing to float transparently over the wiki content toward the

[arch-general] wiki - Add a border to Template:Article summary start ?

Guys, I was working with Template:Article summary start code for the wiki trying to come up with a way to further define it on the page so you don't end up with it appearing to float transparently over the wiki content toward the bottom of the summary -- especially when there is a line of code t

Re: [arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

> > I still need to know what to do with the PKGBUILDs I have so far. I don't > know > if I should upload them as part of the wiki, or just provide links to them > on > another site. I'll create the links once I know where you guys want me to > put > them. I can just leave them on my server (it's n

Re: [arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

On 01/30/2011 03:23 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: > If it's a number of PKGBUILDs, place them for eg. in google code under > a project name eg. "arch-trinity". This allows a one-stop location to > check out everything. You can of course use an aur uploader to mass > upload them. Or you can do both. Thank

Re: [arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

If it's a number of PKGBUILDs, place them for eg. in google code under a project name eg. "arch-trinity". This allows a one-stop location to check out everything. You can of course use an aur uploader to mass upload them. Or you can do both. On 30 January 2011 15:58, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > On

Re: [arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 1:00 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 01/29/2011 12:09 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote: >> 2011/1/28 David C. Rankin >> >>> On 01/28/2011 11:30 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: >>        So what say the powers that be? Do the wiki page here or >>> at Trinity? >>>

Re: [arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

On 01/29/2011 12:09 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > 2011/1/28 David C. Rankin > >> On 01/28/2011 11:30 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: >So what say the powers that be? Do the wiki page here or >> at >>> Trinity? >>> >>> The wiki is for Arch-related documentation, so why not? >>>

Re: [arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

2011/1/28 David C. Rankin > On 01/28/2011 11:30 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > > >So what say the powers that be? Do the wiki page here or > at > >>> > > Trinity? > >>> > > > >>> > > The wiki is for Arch-related documentation, so why not? > >>> > > > >> > > >> > Yes! wiki it up! > > kde3 i

Re: [arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

On 01/28/2011 11:30 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > >So what say the powers that be? Do the wiki page here or at >>> > > Trinity? >>> > > >>> > > The wiki is for Arch-related documentation, so why not? >>> > > >> > >> > Yes! wiki it up! > kde3 is only dead as long as noone maintains it. That

Re: [arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 12:38 -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: > > > On 29 January 2011 01:20, David C. Rankin > > wrote: > > > Guys, > > > > > >As I work through building the pkgbuilds for Trinity on Arch, I > > have > > > been keeping not

Re: [arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: > On 29 January 2011 01:20, David C. Rankin > wrote: > > Guys, > > > >As I work through building the pkgbuilds for Trinity on Arch, I > have > > been keeping notes, etc. on what has to take place. I will put that > > information up on a

Re: [arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

On 29 January 2011 01:20, David C. Rankin wrote: > Guys, > >        As I work through building the pkgbuilds for Trinity on Arch, I have > been keeping notes, etc. on what has to take place. I will put that > information up on a wiki. My question to the Arch devs is "do you want it > here on the A

Re: [arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

On Friday 28 January 2011 17:20:40 David C. Rankin wrote: > As I work through building the pkgbuilds for Trinity on Arch, I have > been > keeping notes, etc. on what has to take place. I will put that information > up on a wiki. My question to the Arch devs is "do you want it here on the > A

[arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

Guys, As I work through building the pkgbuilds for Trinity on Arch, I have been keeping notes, etc. on what has to take place. I will put that information up on a wiki. My question to the Arch devs is "do you want it here on the Arch wiki, or do you want it over on the Trinity wiki?" It do

[arch-general] [wiki] reflect xorg changes

Hello all, A short while ago, I posted this topic: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=104651 Through here, I'm hoping to reach some more willing archers to assist in the updating of some keystone wiki articles. The bullet points: the changes that accompanied xorg 1.8.x have not been refl

Re: [arch-general] wiki email confirmation won't confirm

On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Arvid Picciani wrote: > Hey, > i'm trying to sign up for the wiki, > the confirmation link yields a page that says: > > "Your e-mail address has now been confirmed." > > > though in the account preferences remains: > > > "Your e-mail address is not yet authenticate

[arch-general] wiki email confirmation won't confirm

Hey, i'm trying to sign up for the wiki, the confirmation link yields a page that says: "Your e-mail address has now been confirmed." though in the account preferences remains: "Your e-mail address is not yet authenticated. No e-mail will be sent for any of the following features." And i c

Re: [arch-general] [wiki] Using File Capabilities Instead Of Setuid

Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > Hi people, > > I created a interesting article wiki page for the new libcap 2 (from > Hugo Doria) package that are in [testing] now. > It cover all [core] packages that have setuid-root (all works fine), and > the xorg-server(*) from [extra]. > > Oops i missed the

[arch-general] [wiki] Using File Capabilities Instead Of Setuid

Hi people, I created a interesting article wiki page for the new libcap 2 (from Hugo Doria) package that are in [testing] now. It cover all [core] packages that have setuid-root (all works fine), and the xorg-server(*) from [extra]. I invite all those who want to work with other packages that use

Re: [arch-general] Wiki/AUR Mirrors

so can we get a dev to comment on this? what do they think about mirroring this stuff On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Luke S Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dieter Plaetinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > You could use Mysql replication (master-slave). I have some experience > > working

Re: [arch-general] Wiki/AUR Mirrors

Dieter Plaetinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You could use Mysql replication (master-slave). I have some experience > working with replication setups, so I can help you if you want. In the > event the master goes down you can use your slave as read-only copy or > even do writes on it, but then

Re: [arch-general] Wiki/AUR Mirrors

You could use Mysql replication (master-slave). I have some experience working with replication setups, so I can help you if you want. In the event the master goes down you can use your slave as read-only copy or even do writes on it, but then you'll need to push the changes back to the original

Re: [arch-general] Wiki/AUR Mirrors

I am also willing to contribute a AUR/wiki mirror.. not sure how the mysql/db syncing will happen though. On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:38:45AM +0100, Geoffroy Carrier wrote: > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 03:30, Stythys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Due to our recent downtime, I wanted to open a discussi

Re: [arch-general] Wiki/AUR Mirrors

On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 03:30, Stythys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Due to our recent downtime, I wanted to open a discussion about the > possibility of mirroring the wiki/aur. I'm sure the are many people among > the community (including myself) who'd be willing to put forth some hosting. I still h

[arch-general] Wiki/AUR Mirrors

Due to our recent downtime, I wanted to open a discussion about the possibility of mirroring the wiki/aur. I'm sure the are many people among the community (including myself) who'd be willing to put forth some hosting.