On 22.05.2017 00:36, Steven Noonan wrote:
> None of the mirrors are listed as "successfully syncing mirrors", or even
> as "out of sync mirrors" for that matter.
Thanks for the notification. The mirrors and the data collection are
fine, it's just an issue with displaying the data. We are looking i
None of the mirrors are listed as "successfully syncing mirrors", or even
as "out of sync mirrors" for that matter.
http://i.imgur.com/KW8Rmd9.png
https://www.archlinux.org/mirrors/status/
Presumably it can't make a determination one way or another about their
sync status since it's failing to co
Hi,
I don't think hashes are a good way to do that. The Repositories are quite
large I'm not sure what value is the right one from this [1] statistics
page. Either way, after every update the mirror would effectively block for
the time the hash is computed, since everything has to be read.
Anyway
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:54 +0100, Guus Snijders wrote:
> Op 15 jan. 2014 19:17 schreef "Mark Lee" het volgende:
> >
> [...]
> > > > There is a file called lastsync. It is read <
> > > > http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/archlinux/lastsync>
> > >
> > > Yes, I see that there's a check script but wh
Op 15 jan. 2014 19:17 schreef "Mark Lee" het volgende:
>
[...]
> > > There is a file called lastsync. It is read <
> > > http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/archlinux/lastsync>
> >
> > Yes, I see that there's a check script but what is it? I'd like to know
> > how that link calculates percent synchr
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 13:10 -0500, Mark Lee wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 11:15 -0500, Simon Gomizelj wrote:
> > Not to be that guy... but your link explains. Like right in the first 5
> > sentences.
> >
> > > The check script runs on a regular basis and polls for the lastsync file
> > in the roo
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 11:15 -0500, Simon Gomizelj wrote:
> Not to be that guy... but your link explains. Like right in the first 5
> sentences.
>
> > The check script runs on a regular basis and polls for the lastsync file
> in the root of our repository layout. This file is regularly updated on t
Am 15.01.2014 17:15, schrieb Simon Gomizelj:
>> The check script runs on a regular basis and polls for the lastsync file
> in the root of our repository layout. This file is regularly updated on the
> central repository, so checking the value within allows one to see if the
> mirror has synced rece
Not to be that guy... but your link explains. Like right in the first 5
sentences.
> The check script runs on a regular basis and polls for the lastsync file
in the root of our repository layout. This file is regularly updated on the
central repository, so checking the value within allows one to s
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 23:37 +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Mark Lee wrote:
> > Salutations,
> >
> > Pardon me but does anyone know how mirrors are synced and flagged out of
> > date?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mark
> >
> > --
> > Mark Lee
>
> I don't understand your
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Mark Lee wrote:
> Salutations,
>
> Pardon me but does anyone know how mirrors are synced and flagged out of
> date?
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> --
> Mark Lee
I don't understand your question. What do you mean by 'how'?
https://www.archlinux.org/mirrors/status/
http
Salutations,
Pardon me but does anyone know how mirrors are synced and flagged out of
date?
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark Lee
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 31 May 2012 16:46:36 +0530
gt wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:34:05AM +0100, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 May 2012 08:33:46 +0100
> > Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:19 AM, P .NIKOLIC
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi ..
> > > >
> > > > I am gettin
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:34:05AM +0100, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012 08:33:46 +0100
> Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:19 AM, P .NIKOLIC
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi ..
> > >
> > > I am getting lots of errors from the mirror.lividpenguin.com
> > > stating :
On Thu, 31 May 2012 08:33:46 +0100
Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:19 AM, P .NIKOLIC
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi ..
> >
> > I am getting lots of errors from the mirror.lividpenguin.com
> > stating : Given file does not exist is this mirror having
> > problems or should i remov
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:19 AM, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
>
> Hi ..
>
> I am getting lots of errors from the mirror.lividpenguin.com stating
> : Given file does not exist is this mirror having problems or should
> i remove it from my mirrors list this has been an issue for best part
> of a week
Hi ..
I am getting lots of errors from the mirror.lividpenguin.com stating
: Given file does not exist is this mirror having problems or should
i remove it from my mirrors list this has been an issue for best part
of a week now
Pete .
--
Linux 7-of-9 3.3.7-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue
Am Fri, 25 May 2012 21:41:08 +0200
schrieb Jakob Wadsager :
> gwdg.de is upstream for some of the mirrors in your mirrorlist, and it
> had problems. I've been in contact with an admin earlier this day and
> it seems the problems have been resolved. The third in your mirrorlist
> (archlinux.limun.o
On 25 May 2012 19:10, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Unfortunately I use none of those mirrors. So uk2.net couldn't be the
> reason.
gwdg.de is upstream for some of the mirrors in your mirrorlist, and it
had problems. I've been in contact with an admin earlier this day and
it seems the problems have been
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Fri, 25 May 2012 12:26:02 +0200
> schrieb Jakob Wadsager :
>
>> On 25 May 2012 10:09, Heiko Baums wrote:
>> > Is there a problem with the mirrors and their synchronization or
>> > with the package database?
>>
>> Our uk2.net mirror has some
Am Fri, 25 May 2012 12:26:02 +0200
schrieb Jakob Wadsager :
> On 25 May 2012 10:09, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > Is there a problem with the mirrors and their synchronization or
> > with the package database?
>
> Our uk2.net mirror has some problems. For this reason we have added a
> new tier 1 mirror
Am Fri, 25 May 2012 16:19:54 +0200
schrieb Bjoern Franke :
> Do you mean mir.archlinux.fr?
Yes.
Heiko
Hi,
>
> It's not only the German mirrors, it's at least one French mirror, too.
Do you mean mir.archlinux.fr?
> > Server = http://mirrors.kernel.org/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch
>
> Server = http://mirror.archlinux.no/$repo/os/$arch seems to work, too.
http://mirror.devnu11.net/archlinux/ does a
On Fri, 25 May 2012 12:26:02 +0200
Jakob Wadsager wrote:
> The mirrors that sync of
> uk2[1]
Syncing Demand probably explains why UK2 was sometimes slow late at
night (early morning).
On 25 May 2012 10:09, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Is there a problem with the mirrors and their synchronization or with
> the package database?
Our uk2.net mirror has some problems. For this reason we have added a
new tier 1 mirror (hosted by LeaseWeb). The mirrors that sync of
uk2[1] will hopefully soo
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Axilleas Pi wrote:
> I had the same problem. I think the problem is with ftp mirrors. Try one
> http and see how it goes. At least, one I tried solved this problem.
>
I also had this problem with the Spanish Rediris, and it is an HTTP mirror.
I've changed to ano
Am Fri, 25 May 2012 14:45:22 +0300
schrieb Axilleas Pi :
> I had the same problem. I think the problem is with ftp mirrors. Try
> one http and see how it goes. At least, one I tried solved this
> problem.
I forgot to mention this, I admit, but I only use http mirrors.
Heiko
On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:07:24 +0200
Heiko Baums wrote:
> Like I've written in my first e-mail this didn't help me.
mirror.bytemark.co.uk has the 3.3.6 package too from the 13th I think.
Newest package I saw very quickly so take with a grain of salt was from
the 21st.
I'd work down from the root s
On 05/25/2012 12:07 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Fri, 25 May 2012 11:02:29 +0200
> schrieb Patrick Steinhardt :
>
>> I've experienced the same problems. I was able to solve the problem by
>> forcing database-updates with 'pacman -Syy'.
> Like I've written in my first e-mail this didn't help me.
>
>
Am Fri, 25 May 2012 11:02:29 +0200
schrieb Patrick Steinhardt :
> I've experienced the same problems. I was able to solve the problem by
> forcing database-updates with 'pacman -Syy'.
Like I've written in my first e-mail this didn't help me.
Heiko
Hi,
I've experienced the same problems. I was able to solve the problem by
forcing database-updates with 'pacman -Syy'.
Regards,
Patrick
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Fri, 25 May 2012 10:36:36 +0200
> schrieb Maximilian Bräutigam :
>
>> I discovered the same problem
Am Fri, 25 May 2012 10:36:36 +0200
schrieb Maximilian Bräutigam :
> I discovered the same problem for German mirrors. Finally, I got my
> kernel 3.3.7 from
It's not only the German mirrors, it's at least one French mirror, too.
> Server = http://mirrors.kernel.org/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch
Serv
Am 25.05.2012 10:09, schrieb Heiko Baums:
Is there a problem with the mirrors and their synchronization or with
the package database?
Since a while pacman tells me that my package databases for all repos
are up-to-date. The latest version of linux in those databases is linux
3.3.6-1 while the la
Is there a problem with the mirrors and their synchronization or with
the package database?
Since a while pacman tells me that my package databases for all repos
are up-to-date. The latest version of linux in those databases is linux
3.3.6-1 while the latest version in [core] should be 3.3.7-1 acc
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:13:46 -0400
Andrei Thorp wrote:
> Excerpts from David Rosenstrauch's message of Thu Jul 16 11:04:45
> -0400 2009:
> > Anyone know what's up with the mirrors? Looks like nearly all the
> > US mirrors (RIT, SUU, EasyNews, UMFlint, GaTech, VT - even
> > Schlunix) are running
Excerpts from David Rosenstrauch's message of Thu Jul 16 11:04:45 -0400 2009:
> Anyone know what's up with the mirrors? Looks like nearly all the US
> mirrors (RIT, SUU, EasyNews, UMFlint, GaTech, VT - even Schlunix) are
> running 1-2 days old. Only mirror that seems to have new packages is
>
On Thursday 16 July 2009 17:04:45 David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> Anyone know what's up with the mirrors? Looks like nearly all the US
> mirrors (RIT, SUU, EasyNews, UMFlint, GaTech, VT - even Schlunix) are
> running 1-2 days old. Only mirror that seems to have new packages is
> Unixheads, and it's *
Anyone know what's up with the mirrors? Looks like nearly all the US
mirrors (RIT, SUU, EasyNews, UMFlint, GaTech, VT - even Schlunix) are
running 1-2 days old. Only mirror that seems to have new packages is
Unixheads, and it's *dog slow*.
Is there some Arch-wide problem going on?
TIA,
DR
38 matches
Mail list logo
